160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19813268)
21. Performance of liquid-based, thin-layer cervical cytology: correlation with reference diagnoses and human papillomavirus testing.
Sherman ME; Mendoza M; Lee KR; Ashfaq R; Birdsong GG; Corkill ME; McIntosh KM; Inhorn SL; Zahniser DJ; Baber G; Barber C; Stoler MH
Mod Pathol; 1998 Sep; 11(9):837-43. PubMed ID: 9758363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The ThinPrep Pap test. A review of clinical studies.
Linder J; Zahniser D
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 9022723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
Monsonego J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C
Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical results of a split sample liquid-based cytology (ThinPrep) study of 4,322 patients in a Turkish institution.
Tuncer ZS; Başaran M; Sezgin Y; Firat P; Mocan Kuzey G
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2005; 26(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 16398228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of ThinPrep Integrated Imager-Assisted Screening versus Manual Screening of ThinPrep Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens.
Tanaka K; Aoki D; Tozawa-Ono A; Suzuki N; Takamatsu K; Nakamura M; Tsunoda H; Seino S; Kobayashi N; Shirayama T; Takahashi F
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(5):486-491. PubMed ID: 32535593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of CellSolutions BestPrep® automated thin-layer liquid-based cytology Papanicolaou slide preparation and BestCyte® cell sorter imaging system.
Delga A; Goffin F; Kridelka F; Marée R; Lambert C; Delvenne P
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(5):469-77. PubMed ID: 25277345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Direct comparison of liquid-based and conventional cytology in a South African screening trial.
Taylor S; Kuhn L; Dupree W; Denny L; De Souza M; Wright TC
Int J Cancer; 2006 Feb; 118(4):957-62. PubMed ID: 16152600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of screening times between the ThinPrep Imager and conventional cytology.
Boost T
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Sep; 37(9):661-4. PubMed ID: 19459203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Interobserver variability: comparison between liquid-based and conventional preparations in gynecologic cytology.
Chhieng DC; Talley LI; Roberson J; Gatscha RM; Jhala NC; Elgert PA
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 96(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 11954023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic value, feasibility, and validity of preparing cell blocks from fluid-based gynecologic cytology specimens.
Keyhani-Rofagha S; Vesey-Shecket M
Cancer; 2002 Aug; 96(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 12209661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology.
Celik C; Gezginç K; Toy H; Findik S; Yilmaz O
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Feb; 100(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 17920599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. P16INK4A as an adjunct test in liquid-based cytology.
Bibbo M; DeCecco J; Kovatich AJ
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2003 Feb; 25(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 12630076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of Efficacy and Accuracy of Cervical Cytology Screening With Artificial Intelligence Assistive System.
Bai X; Wei J; Starr D; Zhang X; Wu X; Guo Y; Liu Y; Ma X; Wei Y; Li C; Zilla ML; Zhang W; Zeng X; Zhao C
Mod Pathol; 2024 Jun; 37(6):100486. PubMed ID: 38588882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic efficacy and validity of the ThinPrep method in cervical cytology.
Tezuka F; Oikawa H; Shuki H; Higashiiwai H
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8669188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Morphologic analysis of false negative SurePath® slides using Focalpoint™ GS computer-assisted cervical screening technology: An Australian experience.
Bowditch RC; Clarke JM; Baird PJ; Greenberg ML
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):870-8. PubMed ID: 26174002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cytologic features of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in thinprep papanicolaou test slides and conventional smears: comparison of cases that performed poorly with those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Renshaw AA; Dubray-Benstein B; Haja J; Hughes JH;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Jan; 129(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 15628904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Differentiating between endocervical glandular neoplasia and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in endocervical crypts: cytological features in ThinPrep and SurePath cervical cytology samples.
Thiryayi SA; Marshall J; Rana DN
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 May; 37(5):315-9. PubMed ID: 19191292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is there a role for the thinprep imaging system in reporting anal cytology?
Margaret Roberts J; Jin F; Ekman D; Kay Adams M; Lindsay McDonald R; Kathleen Thurloe J; Richards A; Mary Poynten I; Law C; Kincaid Fairley C; John Hillman R; Tabrizi SN; Marie Cornall A; James Templeton D; Marie Garland S; Edwin Grulich A; Farnsworth A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 May; 44(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 26876374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative analysis of conventional Papanicolaou tests and a fluid-based thin-layer method.
Limaye A; Connor AJ; Huang X; Luff R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Feb; 127(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 12562235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of cellular residue in the ThinPrep PreservCyt vial.
Massarani-Wafai R; Bakhos R; Wojcik EM; Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Sep; 23(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 10945912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
