These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19813422)
1. Implant success in distracted bone versus autogenous bone-grafted sites. Elo JA; Herford AS; Boyne PJ J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 19813422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant survival in maxillary and mandibular osseous onlay grafts and native bone: a 3-year clinical and computerized tomographic follow-up. Sbordone L; Toti P; Menchini-Fabris G; Sbordone C; Guidetti F Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 19885411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible. Demetriades N; Park JI; Laskarides C J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 20662673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term peri-implant bone level changes of non-vascularized fibula bone grafted edentulous patients. Duttenhoefer F; Nack C; Doll C; Raguse JD; Hell B; Stricker A; Nelson K; Nahles S J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 25863644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Autogenous onlay bone grafts vs. alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 2-4-year prospective study on humans. Chiapasco M; Zaniboni M; Rimondini L Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 17501979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new technique for reconstruction of the atrophied narrow alveolar crest in the maxilla using morselized impacted bone allograft and later placement of dental implants. Holmquist P; Dasmah A; Sennerby L; Hallman M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 18462204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of mandibular dentition on implant failures in bone-grafted edentulous maxillae. Becktor JP; Eckert SE; Isaksson S; Keller EE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 11858576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of cancellous block allograft for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement in the posterior atrophic maxilla. Chaushu G; Mardinger O; Calderon S; Moses O; Nissan J J Periodontol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):422-8. PubMed ID: 19254126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone resorption and complications in alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Ettl T; Gerlach T; Schüsselbauer T; Gosau M; Reichert TE; Driemel O Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Oct; 14(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 19774402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maxillary tuberosity block bone graft: innovative technique and case report. Tolstunov L J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1723-9. PubMed ID: 19615588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay grafting. Part I: outcome of implant integration. Perry M; Hodges N; Hallmon DW; Rees T; Opperman LA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 16274142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reconstruction of posterior mandibular alveolar ridge deficiencies with the piezoelectric hinge-assisted ridge split technique: a retrospective observational report. Holtzclaw DJ; Toscano NJ; Rosen PS J Periodontol; 2010 Nov; 81(11):1580-6. PubMed ID: 20594048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with autogenous bone, platelet-rich plasma, and implants: 1-year results of a controlled prospective 5-year study. Thor A; Wannfors K; Sennerby L; Rasmusson L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(4):209-20. PubMed ID: 16336912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants. Five-month post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial. Felice P; Soardi E; Pellegrino G; Pistilli R; Marchetti C; Gessaroli M; Esposito M Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(3):191-202. PubMed ID: 22043464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant success in sinus-lifted maxillae and native bone: a 3-year clinical and computerized tomographic follow-up. Sbordone L; Toti P; Menchini-Fabris G; Sbordone C; Guidetti F Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 19492648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning. Sbordone L; Levin L; Guidetti F; Sbordone C; Glikman A; Schwartz-Arad D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 21087315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Outcome of oral implants after autogenous bone reconstruction]. Kamal D; Abida S; Jammet P; Goudot P; Yachouh J Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Apr; 110(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 19327803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with free iliac crest grafts and implants: a 3-year report of a prospective clinical study. Sjöström M; Sennerby L; Nilson H; Lundgren S Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 9(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 17362496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla using the combination of autogenous and allogeneic bone grafts followed by protocol-type prosthesis. Margonar R; dos Santos PL; Queiroz TP; Marcantonio E J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1894-6. PubMed ID: 21119449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]