530 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19813513)
1. Stark Law changes are on the horizon.
Armon BD
Del Med J; 2009 Aug; 81(8):293-4. PubMed ID: 19813513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage?
Manchikanti L; McMahon EB
Pain Physician; 2007 Nov; 10(6):725-41. PubMed ID: 17987094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stark II Final Rule (Phase I): some answers, more questions.
Shay AW; Murphy SL
Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 15988954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How did physician ownership become a federal case? The Stark Amendments and their prospects.
Stout SM; Warner DC
HEC Forum; 2003 Jun; 15(2):171-87. PubMed ID: 12918284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Federal three-pronged attack on physician self-referrals and possible kickbacks.
Tully WB
Healthspan; 1993 Dec; 10(11):3-7. PubMed ID: 10167064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Stark Law: boon or boondoggle? An analysis of the prohibition on physician self-referrals.
Wales SD
Law Psychol Rev; 2003; 27():1-28. PubMed ID: 16514757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Stark II" and state self-referral restrictions.
Dechene JC; O'Neill KP
J Health Hosp Law; 1996; 29(2):65-87. PubMed ID: 10160176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Stark Act--joint ventures.
Becker S
Health Care Law Mon; 1998 Sep; ():11-6. PubMed ID: 10186113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospital-physician compensation methods under the Stark Act.
Becker S; Nino K
Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Mar; ():3-8. PubMed ID: 10351447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the Stark law necessary? An interview with a health law expert. Interview by Joan Naper.
Gaynor JM
Hosp Technol Ser; 1995 Oct; 14(12):3-5. PubMed ID: 10152541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stark revelations.
Murer CG
Rehab Manag; 2003 Oct; 16(8):46-9. PubMed ID: 14558426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Yet more changes to the stark law regulations.
Reisman G; Wool HS; Chananie SJ; Finnegan JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Feb; 6(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 19179234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Stark truth. Government tries to make sense of long and complex law.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2004 Jun; 100(6):37-8. PubMed ID: 15267024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Self-referral Q&A. Stark II expands federal restrictions on physician referral practices.
Barton HM
Tex Med; 1995 Feb; 91(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 7701439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stark outlook for physician self-referrals.
Tabler NG; Haycox RM
Indiana Med; 1994; 87(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 7989736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. HCFA issues. Stark II proposed rules.
Portman RM; Lisa GC
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jun; 83(6):20-23. PubMed ID: 10180259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Finally, HCFA proposes regulations interpreting stark II.
Katayama AC
WMJ; 1998 Mar; 97(3):67-73. PubMed ID: 9540454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. New final Stark II regulations.
Pontius CA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 May; 33(5):14. PubMed ID: 11373811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A review of the new Stark Phase II regulations.
Siegel S
Health Care Law Mon; 2004 Jun; ():3-15. PubMed ID: 15250190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Can it be--Pete Stark, the doctor's pal?. Interview by Michael Pretzer.
Stark P
Med Econ; 1998 Dec; 75(24):45-6, 48-9. PubMed ID: 10338829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
