These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19813814)

  • 1. Talker-to-listener distance effects on speech production and perception.
    Cheyne HA; Kalgaonkar K; Clements M; Zurek P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):2052-60. PubMed ID: 19813814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments.
    Pelegrín-García D; Smits B; Brunskog J; Jeong CH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):1981-90. PubMed ID: 21476654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the perception of similarity among talkers.
    Remez RE; Fellowes JM; Nagel DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3688-96. PubMed ID: 18247776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual consequences of changes in vocoded speech parameters in various reverberation conditions.
    Drgas S; Blaszak MA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 52(4):945-55. PubMed ID: 19380609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speaking rate and fundamental frequency as speech cues to perceived age.
    Harnsberger JD; Shrivastav R; Brown WS; Rothman H; Hollien H
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16968663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):391-409. PubMed ID: 17469975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test.
    Markham D; Hazan V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):725-37. PubMed ID: 15324282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of production and presentation level on the auditory distance perception of speech.
    Brungart DS; Scott KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):425-40. PubMed ID: 11508968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Infants' listening in multitalker environments: effect of the number of background talkers.
    Newman RS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):822-36. PubMed ID: 19429961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy of absolute localization judgments for speech stimuli.
    Gilkey RH; Anderson TR
    J Vestib Res; 1995; 5(6):487-97. PubMed ID: 8589858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic and perceptual cues to contrastive stress in dysarthria.
    Patel R; Campellone P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):206-22. PubMed ID: 18695019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Message and talker identification in older adults: effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers' voices, and meaningfulness of the competing message.
    Rossi-Katz J; Arehart KH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 52(2):435-53. PubMed ID: 19064902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of aberrant acoustic properties on the perception of sound quality in electrolarynx speech.
    Meltzner GS; Hillman RE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):766-79. PubMed ID: 16378472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of speaker gender on listener judgments of tracheoesophageal speech.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC; Hansen K; Beaudin PG
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 17055223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling Speech Level as a Function of Background Noise Level and Talker-to-Listener Distance for Talkers Wearing Hearing Protection Devices.
    Bouserhal RE; Bockstael A; MacDonald E; Falk TH; Voix J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 60(12):3393-3403. PubMed ID: 29204606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of actual and imputed talker gender on fricative perception, revisited (L).
    Munson B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2631-4. PubMed ID: 22087888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utterance-based proposed spot diagnostic system of vocal tract malfunction.
    Fayed ZT
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2001; 37():485-91. PubMed ID: 11347439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relative contributions of speaking fundamental frequency and formant frequencies to gender identification based on isolated vowels.
    Gelfer MP; Mikos VA
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):544-54. PubMed ID: 16301101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.