529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19815159)
21. Objective classification of nose-lip-chin profiles and their relation to dentoskeletal traits.
Tanikawa C; Takada K
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Nov; 17(4):226-38. PubMed ID: 24889019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Improved lip esthetics in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry after isolated mandibular orthognathic surgery.
Xu W; Tan H; Meng X; Huang Y; Cao L; Zheng L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 May; 161(5):e407-e415. PubMed ID: 34996662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of soft and hard tissue profiles of orthognathic surgery patients treated recently and 20 years earlier.
Papadopoulos MA; Lazaridou-Terzoudi T; Øland J; Athanasiou AE; Melsen B
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e8-13. PubMed ID: 19540447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Relationship between the masticatory muscles and mandibular skeleton in mandibular prognathism with and without asymmetry.
Kwon TG; Lee KH; Park HS; Ryoo HM; Kim HJ; Lee SH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 65(8):1538-43. PubMed ID: 17656280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A nonradiographic approach to detect Class III skeletal discrepancies.
Staudt CB; Kiliaridis S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19577148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Changes in the lip-line in asymmetrical cases treated with isolated mandibular surgery.
Fujita T; Shirakura M; Koh M; Itoh G; Hayashi H; Tanne K
J Orthod; 2013 Dec; 40(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 24297963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative osseous and soft tissue morphology following cleft lip repair.
Seidenstricker-Kink LM; Becker DB; Govier DP; DeLeon VB; Lo LJ; Kane AA
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2008 Sep; 45(5):511-7. PubMed ID: 18788869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Lip morphological changes in orthodontic treatment. Class II division 1: malocclusion and normal occlusion at rest and on smiling.
Islam R; Kitahara T; Naher L; Hara A; Nakasima A
Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):256-64. PubMed ID: 19216599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing soft-tissue characteristics of facial asymmetry with photographs.
Lee MS; Chung DH; Lee JW; Cha KS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 20620830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A new method to move mandible to intercuspal position in virtual three-dimensional orthognathic surgery by integrating primary occlusion model.
Dai J; Wang X; Hu G; Shen SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):e484-9. PubMed ID: 22907113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of sex and age on facial asymmetry in healthy subjects: a cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Ciusa V; Dellavia C; Tartaglia GM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 59(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 11289167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-dimensional computer-graphic demonstration of facial soft tissue changes in mandibular prognathic patients after mandibular sagittal ramus osteotomy.
Techalertpaisarn P; Kuroda T
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1998; 13(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 9835821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Frontal cephalometrics: practical applications, part 2.
Grummons D; Ricketts RM
World J Orthod; 2004; 5(2):99-119. PubMed ID: 15615129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robust and regional 3D facial asymmetry assessment in hemimandibular hyperplasia and hemimandibular elongation anomalies.
Walters M; Claes P; Kakulas E; Clement JG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22749574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Three-dimensional facial surface analysis of patients with skeletal malocclusion.
Alves PV; Zhao L; Patel PK; Bolognese AM
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 19218859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Facial asymmetry in subjects with skeletal Class III deformity.
Haraguchi S; Takada K; Yasuda Y
Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 11843270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cognition of alterations on a facial form corrected by orthognathic surgery.
Himuro T; Tomita T; Fukui K; Yamaguchi T
Ou Daigaku Shigakushi; 1990 Nov; 17(3):322-31. PubMed ID: 2132325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessing the influence of asymmeftry affecting the mandible and chin point on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 70(1):192-206. PubMed ID: 21571417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Maxillofacial characteristics affecting chin deviation between mandibular retrusion and prognathism patients.
Kim EJ; Palomo JM; Kim SS; Lim HJ; Lee KM; Hwang HS
Angle Orthod; 2011 Nov; 81(6):988-93. PubMed ID: 21649508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Classification of facial asymmetry by cluster analysis.
Hwang HS; Youn IS; Lee KH; Lim HJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):279.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17826592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
