These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19815194)

  • 41. [Against systematic blastocyst single embryo transfer].
    Sifer C; Levy R
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 May; 38(5):361-3. PubMed ID: 20430674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [In favor of blastocyst stage single embryo transfer].
    Guérif F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 May; 38(5):358-60. PubMed ID: 20430671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic review.
    Kirkegaard K; Ingerslev HJ
    Hum Reprod Update; 2014; 20(5):802. PubMed ID: 25035438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Systematic review on clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring.
    Freour T; Basile N; Barriere P; Meseguer M
    Hum Reprod Update; 2015; 21(1):153-4. PubMed ID: 25293345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reply: Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic review.
    Kaser DJ; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod Update; 2014; 20(5):802-3. PubMed ID: 25202964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Reply: Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic review.
    Kaser DJ; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod Update; 2015; 21(1):154. PubMed ID: 25293346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Improved development of human embryos cultured on a Vero cell monolayer.
    Zetová L; Mardesic T; Miková M; Müller P; Stroufová A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1993 Apr; 10(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 8400738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Timing of embryo transfer and outcome.
    Cai XQ
    Fertil Steril; 1989 Jul; 52(1):166-7. PubMed ID: 2783231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Discriminately disposable after single use: the trophectoderm and its derivatives.
    Albertini DF
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jan; 33(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 26732660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Saving embryo freezing].
    Belaisch-Allart J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011 Apr; 39(4):191-2. PubMed ID: 21450509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The blastocyst.
    Plachot M
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Dec; 15 Suppl 4():49-58. PubMed ID: 11262793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Perceptions of trophectoderm as a sentinel for embryo selection.
    Albertini DF
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2014 Nov; 31(11):1401-2. PubMed ID: 25384845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The blastocyst.
    Hardarson T; Van Landuyt L; Jones G
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Aug; 27 Suppl 1():i72-91. PubMed ID: 22763375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical and neonatal outcomes of patients of different ages following transfer of thawed cleavage embryos and blastocysts cultured from thawed cleavage-stage embryos.
    Zhou QW; Jing S; Xu L; Guo H; Lu CF; Gong F; Lu GX; Lin G; Gu YF
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207340. PubMed ID: 30475822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Improvement of vitrification of in vitro produced buffalo embryos with special reference to sex ratio following vitrification.
    Mahmoud KG; Scholkamy TH; Darwish SF
    Iran J Vet Res; 2015; 16(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 27175197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Blastocyst transfer in frozen-thawed cycles.
    Han AR; Park CW; Lee HS; Yang KM; Song IO; Koong MK
    Clin Exp Reprod Med; 2012 Sep; 39(3):114-7. PubMed ID: 23106042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Outcomes of day-1, day-3, and blastocyst cryopreserved embryo transfers.
    Moragianni VA; Cohen JD; Smith SE; Schinfeld JS; Somkuti SG; Lee A; Barmat LI
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Mar; 93(4):1353-5. PubMed ID: 19815194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application.
    Liebermann J; Tucker MJ
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 16762345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers.
    Guerif F; Lemseffer M; Bidault R; Gasnier O; Saussereau MH; Cadoret V; Jamet C; Royere D
    Hum Reprod; 2009 May; 24(5):1051-8. PubMed ID: 19218575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos.
    Richter KS; Shipley SK; McVearry I; Tucker MJ; Widra EA
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Oct; 86(4):862-6. PubMed ID: 16935284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.