These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19815323)

  • 1. Visual expertise does not predict the composite effect across species: a comparison between spider (Ateles geoffroyi) and rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkeys.
    Taubert J; Parr LA
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 19815323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence of human-like, holistic face processing in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi).
    Taubert J
    J Comp Psychol; 2010 Feb; 124(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 20175597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the Jastrow Illusion in Humans ( Homo sapiens), Rhesus Monkeys ( Macaca mulatta), and Capuchin Monkeys ( Sapajus apella).
    Agrillo C; Beran MJ; Parrish AE
    Perception; 2019 May; 48(5):367-385. PubMed ID: 30913960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Taubert J; Qureshi AA; Parr LA
    J Comp Psychol; 2012 Nov; 126(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 22390621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of the Ponzo illusion by rhesus monkeys, chimpanzees, and humans: similarity and difference in the three primate species.
    Fujita K
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 9055623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.
    Parr LA; Heintz M; Pradhan G
    J Comp Psychol; 2008 Nov; 122(4):390-402. PubMed ID: 19014263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Parr LA; Winslow JT; Hopkins WD; de Waal FB
    J Comp Psychol; 2000 Mar; 114(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 10739311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Holistic face processing can be independent of gaze behaviour: evidence from the composite face illusion.
    de Heering A; Rossion B; Turati C; Simion F
    J Neuropsychol; 2008 Mar; 2(1):183-95. PubMed ID: 19334310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spontaneous voice-face identity matching by rhesus monkeys for familiar conspecifics and humans.
    Sliwa J; Duhamel JR; Pascalis O; Wirth S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Jan; 108(4):1735-40. PubMed ID: 21220340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Holistic perception of individual faces in the right middle fusiform gyrus as evidenced by the composite face illusion.
    Schiltz C; Dricot L; Goebel R; Rossion B
    J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):25.1-16. PubMed ID: 20462326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Face perception is whole or none: disentangling the role of spatial contiguity and interfeature distances in the composite face illusion.
    Laguesse R; Rossion B
    Perception; 2013; 42(10):1013-26. PubMed ID: 24494433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How do rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta) scan faces in a visual paired comparison task?
    Gothard KM; Erickson CA; Amaral DG
    Anim Cogn; 2004 Jan; 7(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 14745584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
    Parrish AE; Brosnan SF; Beran MJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):395-405. PubMed ID: 26322505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The inversion effect reveals species differences in face processing.
    Parr LA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):204-10. PubMed ID: 21784381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust representations of individual faces in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) but not monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Taubert J; Weldon KB; Parr LA
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Mar; 20(2):321-329. PubMed ID: 27864643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geometric distortions affect face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Taubert J; Parr LA
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Jan; 14(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 20632050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How the Thatcher illusion reveals evolutionary differences in the face processing of primates.
    Weldon KB; Taubert J; Smith CL; Parr LA
    Anim Cogn; 2013 Sep; 16(5):691-700. PubMed ID: 23420511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tool use in wild spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi).
    Lindshield SM; Rodrigues MA
    Primates; 2009 Jul; 50(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 19370386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discrimination of faces and houses by rhesus monkeys: the role of stimulus expertise and rotation angle.
    Parr LA; Heintz M
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Jul; 11(3):467-74. PubMed ID: 18256863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Memory for "what", "where", and "when" information in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Hoffman ML; Beran MJ; Washburn DA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 19364223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.