These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19815785)
1. A stereo disadvantage for recognizing rotated familiar objects. Pasqualotto A; Hayward WG Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Oct; 16(5):832-8. PubMed ID: 19815785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition. Lawson R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):911-30. PubMed ID: 19653738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age-related changes in matching novel objects across viewpoints. Pilz KS; Konar Y; Vuong QC; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(17):1958-65. PubMed ID: 21784094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrimination of rotated-in-depth curves is facilitated by stereoscopic cues, but curvature is not tuned for stereoscopic rotation-in-depth. Bell J; Kanji J; Kingdom FA Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 77():14-20. PubMed ID: 23194751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate. Logothetis NK; Pauls J Cereb Cortex; 1995; 5(3):270-88. PubMed ID: 7613082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Emergent two-dimensional patterns in images rotated in depth. Pinker S; Finke RA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 May; 6(2):244-64. PubMed ID: 6445935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stereo improves 3D shape discrimination even when rich monocular shape cues are available. Lee YL; Saunders JA J Vis; 2011 Aug; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 21849629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laterality effects in the recognition of depth-rotated novel objects. Curby KM; Hayward G; Gauthier I Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 4(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 15259892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Bülthoff HH; Edelman SY; Tarr MJ Cereb Cortex; 1995; 5(3):247-60. PubMed ID: 7613080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Priming of depth-rotated objects depends on attention and part changes. Thoma V; Davidoff J Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 16610271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A stereo advantage in generalizing over changes in viewpoint on object recognition tasks. Bennett DJ; Vuong QC Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1082-93. PubMed ID: 17355033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Logothetis NK; Pauls J; Bülthoff HH; Poggio T Curr Biol; 1994 May; 4(5):401-14. PubMed ID: 7922354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The configural advantage in object change detection persists across depth rotation. Favelle SK; Hayward WG; Burke D; Palmisano S Percept Psychophys; 2006 Nov; 68(8):1254-63. PubMed ID: 17378412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Viewpoint dependence and scene context effects generalize to depth rotated three-dimensional objects. Kallmayer A; Võ ML; Draschkow D J Vis; 2023 Sep; 23(10):9. PubMed ID: 37707802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of motion and stereopsis on three-dimensional visualization. Hubona GS; Shirah GW; Fout DG Int J Hum Comput Stud; 1997 Nov; 47(5):609-27. PubMed ID: 11541533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]