These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19815930)

  • 1. Generalization of causal efficacy judgments after evaluative learning.
    Dack C; McHugh L; Reed P
    Learn Behav; 2009 Nov; 37(4):336-48. PubMed ID: 19815930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transfer of judgments of control to a target stimulus and to novel stimuli through derived relations.
    Dack C; McHugh L; Reed P
    Learn Behav; 2012 Dec; 40(4):448-64. PubMed ID: 22351510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human causality judgments and response rates on DRL and DRH schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    Learn Behav; 2003 May; 31(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 12882379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Schedules of reinforcement as determinants of human causality judgments and response rates.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jul; 27(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 11497319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple determinants of transfer of evaluative function after conditioning with free-operant schedules of reinforcement.
    Dack C; Reed P; McHugh L
    Learn Behav; 2010 Nov; 38(4):348-66. PubMed ID: 21048226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the cost of responding on human causality judgments.
    Reed P
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Mar; 22(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 8035700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response-independent outcomes impact response rates and judgments of control differentially depending on rate of response-dependent outcomes.
    Reed P
    Learn Behav; 2015 Sep; 43(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 26018877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human instrumental performance in ratio and interval contingencies: A challenge for associative theory.
    Pérez OD; Aitken MR; Zhukovsky P; Soto FA; Urcelay GP; Dickinson A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):311-321. PubMed ID: 27894212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Similarity-based and rule-based generalisation in the acquisition of attitudes via evaluative conditioning.
    Högden F; Stahl C; Unkelbach C
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Feb; 34(1):105-127. PubMed ID: 31020918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 17924790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Free-operant compounding of variable-interval and low-rate discriminative stimuli.
    Weiss SJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Nov; 10(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 6080831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Induced attack during fixed-ratio and matched-time schedules of food presentation.
    Kupfer AS; Allen R; Malagodi EF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Jan; 89(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18338674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increased generalization in a peak procedure after delayed reinforcement.
    Buriticá J; Alcalá E
    Behav Processes; 2019 Dec; 169():103978. PubMed ID: 31580905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of a stimulus filling an action-outcome delay in human judgments of causal effectiveness.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Jan; 25(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 9987860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.
    Lieving GA; Reilly MP; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 17002227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human free-operant performance varies with a concurrent task: Probability learning without a task, and schedule-consistent with a task.
    Reed P
    Learn Behav; 2020 Jun; 48(2):254-273. PubMed ID: 31898165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blocking and unblocking in human causal learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Oakeshott SM; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jan; 31(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 15656727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus control and generalization of remote behavioral history.
    Okouchi H; Lattal KA; Sonoda A; Nakamae T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):275-87. PubMed ID: 24470148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relation between response rates and reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.
    Pliskoff SS; Shull RL; Gollub LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 5660708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.