BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19817645)

  • 1. Development and implementation of an automatic system for verification, validation and delivery of laboratory test results.
    Guidi GC; Poli G; Bassi A; Giobelli L; Benetollo PP; Lippi G
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2009; 47(11):1355-60. PubMed ID: 19817645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of visual vs. automated detection of lipemic, icteric and hemolyzed specimens: can we rely on a human eye?
    Simundic AM; Nikolac N; Ivankovic V; Ferenec-Ruzic D; Magdic B; Kvaternik M; Topic E
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2009; 47(11):1361-5. PubMed ID: 19778291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analytical validation of the results].
    Vassault A; Arnaud J; Szymanovicz A;
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():223-6. PubMed ID: 21613019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficiency of test report delivery to the requesting physician in an outpatient setting: an observational study.
    Simundic AM; Nikolac N; Miler M; Cipak A; Topic E
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2009; 47(9):1063-6. PubMed ID: 19728846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Total laboratory automation: Do stat tests still matter?
    Dolci A; Giavarina D; Pasqualetti S; Szőke D; Panteghini M
    Clin Biochem; 2017 Jul; 50(10-11):605-611. PubMed ID: 28390779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A task-targeted automation system: a case study.
    Pawlick GF; Smith C; Smith C
    Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1999; 13(6):351-6. PubMed ID: 10747661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing.
    Lippi G; Guidi GC; Mattiuzzi C; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(4):358-65. PubMed ID: 16599826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the road to automation, proceed with caution.
    Ford A
    CAP Today; 2004 Mar; 18(3):22, 24, 26 passim. PubMed ID: 15645925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing preanalytical laboratory sample errors through educational and technological interventions.
    Lillo R; Salinas M; Lopez-Garrigos M; Naranjo-Santana Y; Gutiérrez M; Marín MD; Miralles M; Uris J
    Clin Lab; 2012; 58(9-10):911-7. PubMed ID: 23163106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current status of verification practices in clinical biochemistry in Spain.
    Gómez-Rioja R; Alvarez V; Ventura M; Alsina MJ; Barba N; Cortés M; Llopis MA; Martínez C; Ibarz M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Sep; 51(9):1739-46. PubMed ID: 23612663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The "hospital central laboratory": automation, integration and clinical usefulness.
    Zaninotto M; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Jul; 48(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 20459352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving laboratory data entry quality using Six Sigma.
    Elbireer A; Le Chasseur J; Jackson B
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2013; 26(6):496-509. PubMed ID: 24003750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reflective testing: adding value to laboratory testing.
    Verboeket-van de Venne WP; Aakre KM; Watine J; Oosterhuis WP
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2012 Apr; 50(7):1249-52. PubMed ID: 22850057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total Automation for the Core Laboratory: Improving the Turnaround Time Helps to Reduce the Volume of Ordered STAT Tests.
    Ialongo C; Porzio O; Giambini I; Bernardini S
    J Lab Autom; 2016 Jun; 21(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 25882188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory.
    Wang Z; Peng C; Kang H; Fan X; Mu R; Zhou L; He M; Qu B
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Jul; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31269951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of turnaround time by subdividing three phases for outpatient chemistry specimens.
    Chung HJ; Lee W; Chun S; Park HI; Min WK
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2009; 39(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 19429800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should diagnostic lab reports evolve?
    Chatron P
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2017 Oct; 75(5):485-488. PubMed ID: 28958957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The NEXUS vision: an alternative to the reference value concept.
    Goldschmidt HM
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):868-73. PubMed ID: 15327025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technological advances in the hemostasis laboratory.
    Lippi G; Plebani M; Favaloro EJ
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2014 Mar; 40(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 24443219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should we customise critical value procedure according to patient origin and laboratory turnaround time?
    Salinas M; López-Garrigós M; Gutiérrez M; Lugo J; Flors L; Leiva-Salinas C
    J Clin Pathol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 23372177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.