These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19817645)

  • 1. Development and implementation of an automatic system for verification, validation and delivery of laboratory test results.
    Guidi GC; Poli G; Bassi A; Giobelli L; Benetollo PP; Lippi G
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2009; 47(11):1355-60. PubMed ID: 19817645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of visual vs. automated detection of lipemic, icteric and hemolyzed specimens: can we rely on a human eye?
    Simundic AM; Nikolac N; Ivankovic V; Ferenec-Ruzic D; Magdic B; Kvaternik M; Topic E
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2009; 47(11):1361-5. PubMed ID: 19778291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analytical validation of the results].
    Vassault A; Arnaud J; Szymanovicz A;
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():223-6. PubMed ID: 21613019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficiency of test report delivery to the requesting physician in an outpatient setting: an observational study.
    Simundic AM; Nikolac N; Miler M; Cipak A; Topic E
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2009; 47(9):1063-6. PubMed ID: 19728846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Total laboratory automation: Do stat tests still matter?
    Dolci A; Giavarina D; Pasqualetti S; Szőke D; Panteghini M
    Clin Biochem; 2017 Jul; 50(10-11):605-611. PubMed ID: 28390779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A task-targeted automation system: a case study.
    Pawlick GF; Smith C; Smith C
    Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1999; 13(6):351-6. PubMed ID: 10747661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing.
    Lippi G; Guidi GC; Mattiuzzi C; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(4):358-65. PubMed ID: 16599826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the road to automation, proceed with caution.
    Ford A
    CAP Today; 2004 Mar; 18(3):22, 24, 26 passim. PubMed ID: 15645925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing preanalytical laboratory sample errors through educational and technological interventions.
    Lillo R; Salinas M; Lopez-Garrigos M; Naranjo-Santana Y; Gutiérrez M; Marín MD; Miralles M; Uris J
    Clin Lab; 2012; 58(9-10):911-7. PubMed ID: 23163106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current status of verification practices in clinical biochemistry in Spain.
    Gómez-Rioja R; Alvarez V; Ventura M; Alsina MJ; Barba N; Cortés M; Llopis MA; Martínez C; Ibarz M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Sep; 51(9):1739-46. PubMed ID: 23612663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The "hospital central laboratory": automation, integration and clinical usefulness.
    Zaninotto M; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Jul; 48(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 20459352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving laboratory data entry quality using Six Sigma.
    Elbireer A; Le Chasseur J; Jackson B
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2013; 26(6):496-509. PubMed ID: 24003750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reflective testing: adding value to laboratory testing.
    Verboeket-van de Venne WP; Aakre KM; Watine J; Oosterhuis WP
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2012 Apr; 50(7):1249-52. PubMed ID: 22850057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total Automation for the Core Laboratory: Improving the Turnaround Time Helps to Reduce the Volume of Ordered STAT Tests.
    Ialongo C; Porzio O; Giambini I; Bernardini S
    J Lab Autom; 2016 Jun; 21(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 25882188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory.
    Wang Z; Peng C; Kang H; Fan X; Mu R; Zhou L; He M; Qu B
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Jul; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31269951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of turnaround time by subdividing three phases for outpatient chemistry specimens.
    Chung HJ; Lee W; Chun S; Park HI; Min WK
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2009; 39(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 19429800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should diagnostic lab reports evolve?
    Chatron P
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2017 Oct; 75(5):485-488. PubMed ID: 28958957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The NEXUS vision: an alternative to the reference value concept.
    Goldschmidt HM
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):868-73. PubMed ID: 15327025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technological advances in the hemostasis laboratory.
    Lippi G; Plebani M; Favaloro EJ
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2014 Mar; 40(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 24443219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should we customise critical value procedure according to patient origin and laboratory turnaround time?
    Salinas M; López-Garrigós M; Gutiérrez M; Lugo J; Flors L; Leiva-Salinas C
    J Clin Pathol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 23372177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.