244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19818320)
1. Measuring coronary artery plaque volume and composition by MDCT: too much, too soon?
Sola S; Desai MY
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(5):321-2. PubMed ID: 19818320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Image quality at fast heart rates: the piano and the pianist.
Wilke N
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(5):310-1. PubMed ID: 19709945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual-source computed tomography angiography image quality in patients with fast heart rates.
Srichai MB; Hecht EM; Kim D; Babb J; Bod J; Jacobs JE
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(5):300-9. PubMed ID: 19643693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal cardiac phase for coronary artery calcium scoring on single-source 64-MDCT scanner: least interscan variability and least motion artifacts.
Matsuura N; Horiguchi J; Yamamoto H; Hirai N; Tonda T; Kohno N; Ito K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):1561-8. PubMed ID: 18492907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of intracycle motion correction algorithm on image quality and diagnostic performance of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Carrascosa P; Deviggiano A; Capunay C; De Zan MC; Goldsmit A; Rodriguez-Granillo GA
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 25281361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness best R-R reconstruction interval determination software for the evaluation of dual-source coronary CT angiography examinations.
Erol B; Karcaaltincaba M; Cay N; Hazirolan T; Aytemir K; Akata D
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):229-34. PubMed ID: 21412095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel technique for addressing streak artifact in gated dual-source MDCT angiography utilizing ECG-editing.
Meyer LT; Boll DT
Eur Radiol; 2008 Nov; 18(11):2446-8. PubMed ID: 18491110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ECG-edited middiastolic phase reconstruction improves image quality at 64-MDCT coronary angiography of patients with atrial fibrillation.
Matsumoto H; Kondo T; Watanabe S; Kikumoto R; Shimada T; Hiraoka Y; Ueda K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Dec; 191(6):1659-66. PubMed ID: 19020233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current and Novel Imaging Techniques in Coronary CT.
Machida H; Tanaka I; Fukui R; Shen Y; Ishikawa T; Tate E; Ueno E
Radiographics; 2015; 35(4):991-1010. PubMed ID: 26046942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-pitch prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered helical data acquisition: a new tool for the cardiac CT toolbox?
Halliburton SS
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(4):243-5. PubMed ID: 19577212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods of plaque quantification and characterization by cardiac computed tomography.
Maurovich-Horvat P; Ferencik M; Bamberg F; Hoffmann U
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3 Suppl 2():S91-8. PubMed ID: 20129522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Letter to the Editor: re: Body physique and heart rate variability determine the occurrence of stair-step artefacts in 64-slice CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering.
Torres FS; Crean AM; Paul N
Eur Radiol; 2009 Dec; 19(12):2955; author reply 2956-7. PubMed ID: 19629490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [A different ECG triggering can lead to significantly higher radiation doses during thorax CT].
Körner M
Radiologe; 2009 Oct; 49(10):905. PubMed ID: 19727641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The revival of step-and-shoot computed tomography coronary angiography: benefits and open questions.
Alkadhi H
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2008; 2(2):91-2. PubMed ID: 19083927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The challenge of coronary stent imaging.
Nieman K
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2010; 4(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 20159626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of the Motion Correction Technique on Image Quality at 320-Detector Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.
Tatsugami F; Higaki T; Fukumoto W; Kaichi Y; Iida M; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Kihara Y; Awai K
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(4):603-8. PubMed ID: 27096402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of coronary artery plaque volume and composition quantification by 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography: an intraobserver, interobserver, and interscan variability study.
Cheng VY; Nakazato R; Dey D; Gurudevan S; Tabak J; Budoff MJ; Karlsberg RP; Min J; Berman DS
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(5):312-20. PubMed ID: 19709947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of attenuation-based tube current control in coronary artery calcium scoring on prospective ECG-triggered 64-detector CT.
Horiguchi J; Matsuura N; Yamamoto H; Kitagawa T; Sato K; Kihara Y; Ito K
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1231-40. PubMed ID: 19515586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring progression of coronary atherosclerosis with computed tomography: searching for clarity among shades of gray.
Priester TC; Litwin SE
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3 Suppl 2():S81-90. PubMed ID: 20129521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Regression-based cardiac motion prediction from single-phase CTA.
Metz CT; Baka N; Kirisli H; Schaap M; Klein S; Neefjes LA; Mollet NR; Lelieveldt B; de Bruijne M; Niessen WJ; van Walsum T
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Jun; 31(6):1311-25. PubMed ID: 22438512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]