103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19820639)
1. Congress seeks to restore protection with the ADA Amendments Act of 2008.
Vierling LE
Prof Case Manag; 2009; 14(5):265-7. PubMed ID: 19820639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Congress restores the Americans With Disabilities Act to its original intent.
Petrila J
Psychiatr Serv; 2009 Jul; 60(7):878-9. PubMed ID: 19564215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Americans with Disabilities Act: disabled by court decisions.
Coelho T
Neurology; 2007 May; 68(20):1733-6. PubMed ID: 17502557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Americans With Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008: implications for the forensic psychiatrist.
Scott CL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 20305081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. US: Supreme Court adopts narrow definition of "disability" under anti-discrimination law.
Elliott R
Can HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev; 2002 Mar; 6(3):67-9. PubMed ID: 14979273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The judicial dismantling of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Gostin LO
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 12760112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic discrimination: why Bragdon does not ensure protection.
Rothstein LF
J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):330-51. PubMed ID: 15015483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. ADA: Supreme Court disallows disparate impact analysis of facially valid employment procedures.
Walter S
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(2):373-5. PubMed ID: 15301205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legislation seeks to exclude inmates from ADA coverage.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Mar; 14(5):11. PubMed ID: 11366444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Here's a look at status of court rulings on ADA. First key decision involved HIV-infected person.
AIDS Alert; 2001 Feb; 16(2):18, 23-4. PubMed ID: 15446222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Federal appeals court tilt in favor of ADA defendants.
AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Nov; 12(21):4-5. PubMed ID: 11364886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bragdon v. Abbott: extending the Americans with Disability Act to asymptomatic individuals.
Liu E
J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):382-408. PubMed ID: 15015486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. HIV, the ADA, and the duty to treat.
Shepherd L
Houst Law Rev; 2000; 37(4):1055-100. PubMed ID: 12071219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Defining disabled: a study of the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 in eliminating the consideration of certain mitigating measures.
Leonard JW
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2009; 26(1):125-47. PubMed ID: 20112621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Why courts cannot deny ADA protection to plaintiffs who do not use available mitigating measures for their impairments.
Shaw S
Calif Law Rev; 2002 Dec; 90(6):1981-2046. PubMed ID: 12523362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bragdon v. Abbott, asymptomatic genetic conditions, and antidiscrimination law: a conservative perspective.
Clegg R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):409-29. PubMed ID: 15015487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. National Council on Disability seeks to restore ADA.
Vierling LE
Case Manager; 2005; 16(2):26-9. PubMed ID: 15818340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The definition of disability: perspective of the disability community.
Kaplan D
J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):352-64. PubMed ID: 15015484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. HIV cases take time, resources to make ADA claim.
AIDS Policy Law; 2004 Mar; 19(6):6. PubMed ID: 15124566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. 2003 employment decisions under the ADA Title I--survey update.
Allbright AL
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2004; 28(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 15384870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
