BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19821393)

  • 1. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
    Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Setthawong V; Laopaiboon M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007044. PubMed ID: 19821393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
    Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Setthawong V; Laopaiboon M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; (11):CD007044. PubMed ID: 25418417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
    Setthawong V; Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Pattanittum P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Aug; 8(8):CD007044. PubMed ID: 37526261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
    Junbo L; Yugen L; Guo J; Jing H; Ruichao Y; Tao W
    Urol J; 2019 May; 16(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 30604405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.
    Soderberg L; Ergun O; Ding M; Parker R; Borofsky MS; Pais V; Dahm P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Nov; 11(11):CD013445. PubMed ID: 37955353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
    Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
    Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.
    Aboumarzouk OM; Kata SG; Keeley FX; Nabi G
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Dec; (12):CD006029. PubMed ID: 22161396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.
    Aboumarzouk OM; Kata SG; Keeley FX; McClinton S; Nabi G
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 May; (5):CD006029. PubMed ID: 22592707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Which is the best treatment of pediatric upper urinary tract stones among extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review.
    He Q; Xiao K; Chen Y; Liao B; Li H; Wang K
    BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):98. PubMed ID: 31640693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.
    Nabi G; Downey P; Keeley F; Watson G; McClinton S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jan; (1):CD006029. PubMed ID: 17253576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Chung DY; Kang DH; Cho KS; Jeong WS; Jung HD; Kwon JK; Lee SH; Lee JY
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211316. PubMed ID: 30789937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy and safety of the surgical treatments for lower calyceal stones: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Hou J; Xu F; Du H; Liu J; Li N
    Int J Surg; 2023 Mar; 109(3):383-388. PubMed ID: 36906759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Kim CH; Chung DY; Rha KH; Lee JY; Lee SH
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Dec; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33396839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones.
    Donaldson JF; Lardas M; Scrimgeour D; Stewart F; MacLennan S; Lam TB; McClinton S
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):612-6. PubMed ID: 25449204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    De S; Autorino R; Kim FJ; Zargar H; Laydner H; Balsamo R; Torricelli FC; Di Palma C; Molina WR; Monga M; De Sio M
    Eur Urol; 2015 Jan; 67(1):125-137. PubMed ID: 25064687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.
    Vilches RM; Aliaga A; Reyes D; Sepulveda F; Mercado A; Moya F; Ledezma R; Hidalgo JP; Olmedo T; Marchant F
    Actas Urol Esp; 2015 May; 39(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 25435403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
    Zhang W; Zhou T; Wu T; Gao X; Peng Y; Xu C; Chen Q; Song R; Sun Y
    J Endourol; 2015 Jul; 29(7):745-59. PubMed ID: 25531986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. reply letter to Reply letter to: Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
    Cubuk A; Özkaptan O; Sahan A
    Urol J; 2021 Jan; 18(3):351-352. PubMed ID: 33495987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis.
    Akman T; Binbay M; Ozgor F; Ugurlu M; Tekinarslan E; Kezer C; Aslan R; Muslumanoglu AY
    BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(9):1384-9. PubMed ID: 22093679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Tsai SH; Chung HJ; Tseng PT; Wu YC; Tu YK; Hsu CW; Lei WT
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Mar; 99(10):e19403. PubMed ID: 32150088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 64.