305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19821927)
1. Goldmann tonometry versus the Tono-Pen XL for intraocular pressure measurement: an evaluation of the potential impact on clinical decision making in glaucoma.
Carrim ZI; Lavy TE
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Nov; 29(6):648-51. PubMed ID: 19821927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.
Tonnu PA; Ho T; Sharma K; White E; Bunce C; Garway-Heath D
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):847-50. PubMed ID: 15965164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Measurement of intraocular pressure using the Tono-Pen in comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study in 100 eyes].
Deuter CM; Schlote T; Hahn GA; Bende T; Derse M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Mar; 219(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 11987041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Tonnu PA; Ho T; Newson T; El Sheikh A; Sharma K; White E; Bunce C; Garway-Heath D
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):851-4. PubMed ID: 15965165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative study of two portable tonometers: Tono-Pen XL and Perkins].
Andrada Márquez MT; Fesser Oroz I; Antón López A
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2003 Apr; 78(4):189-96. PubMed ID: 12743842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement and reproducibility of Tono-Pen XL tip covered with ocufilm and fingertip of surgical glove in intra-ocular pressure measurement.
Sayawat N; Duangnumsawang D
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Apr; 95 Suppl 4():S102-6. PubMed ID: 22696861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of rebound and applanation tonometry in the management of patients treated for glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Rehnman JB; Martin L
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 18565094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tono-Pen versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Comparison of 898 Eyes.
Bao B; Diaconita V; Schulz DC; Hutnik C
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2019; 2(6):435-439. PubMed ID: 32672578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Tono-Pen and Goldmann tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma.
Horowitz GS; Byles J; Lee J; D'Este C
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 32(6):584-9. PubMed ID: 15575828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
García-Resúa C; González-Meijome JM; Gilino J; Yebra-Pimentel E
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
Schlote T; Landenberger H
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Scleral Tono-Pen Intraocular Pressure Measurements with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry.
Badakere SV; Choudhari NS; Rao HL; Chary CR; Garudadri CS; Senthil S
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 29370020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements using goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: an in vitro model.
Neuburger M; Maier P; Böhringer D; Reinhard T; F Jordan J
J Glaucoma; 2013 Sep; 22(7):584-90. PubMed ID: 22366704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen.
Bhan A; Browning AC; Shah S; Hamilton R; Dave D; Dua HS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 May; 43(5):1389-92. PubMed ID: 11980851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive correlation between Tono-Pen intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness.
Dohadwala AA; Munger R; Damji KF
Ophthalmology; 1998 Oct; 105(10):1849-54. PubMed ID: 9787354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Osman EA; Gikandi PW; Al-Jasser AA; Alotaibi M; Mousa A
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2018; 25(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 29899644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
