These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Sharing stories: narrative and dialogue in responsive nursing evaluation. Abma TA; Widdershoven GA Eval Health Prof; 2005 Mar; 28(1):90-109. PubMed ID: 15677389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Abma TA; Nierse CJ; Widdershoven GA Qual Health Res; 2009 Mar; 19(3):401-15. PubMed ID: 19224882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The study of client-provider interactions: a review of methodological issues. Simmons R; Elias C Stud Fam Plann; 1994; 25(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 8209391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The unique character of involvement in multi-site evaluation settings. Toal SA; King JA; Johnson K; Lawrenz F Eval Program Plann; 2009 May; 32(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 19062092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relational responsibilities in responsive evaluation. Visse M; Abma TA; Widdershoven GA Eval Program Plann; 2012 Feb; 35(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 22054529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Participatory evaluation (I)--sharing lessons from fieldwork in Asia. Crishna B Child Care Health Dev; 2007 May; 33(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 17439432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Developing interdisciplinary maternity services policy in Canada. Evaluation of a consensus workshop. Martin CM; Kasperski J J Eval Clin Pract; 2010 Feb; 16(1):238-45. PubMed ID: 20367842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Challenges in data collection, analysis, and distribution of information in community coalition demonstration projects. Gallagher K; Stanley A; Shearer D; Klerman LV J Adolesc Health; 2005 Sep; 37(3 Suppl):S53-60. PubMed ID: 16115571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Trelleborg project: a process evaluation of a multi-sector community intervention to reduce alcohol consumption and related harm. Stafström M; Larsson S Subst Use Misuse; 2007; 42(12-13):2041-51. PubMed ID: 18075927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Responsive evaluation in health promotion: its value for ambiguous contexts. Abma TA Health Promot Int; 2005 Dec; 20(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 15972302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit. Bryson JM; Patton MQ; Bowman RA Eval Program Plann; 2011 Feb; 34(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20674980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Involving stakeholders in the evaluation of community alcohol projects: finding a balance between subjective insight and objective facts. Boots K; Midford R Subst Use Misuse; 2007; 42(12-13):1955-69. PubMed ID: 18075920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating public participation in environmental decision-making: EPA's superfund community involvement program. Charnley S; Engelbert B J Environ Manage; 2005 Nov; 77(3):165-82. PubMed ID: 16112794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Collaborative evaluation within a framework of stakeholder-oriented evaluation approaches. O'Sullivan RG Eval Program Plann; 2012 Nov; 35(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 22364849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When the trivial becomes meaningful: reflections on a process evaluation of a home visitation programme in South Africa. Odendaal WA; Marais S; Munro S; van Niekerk A Eval Program Plann; 2008 May; 31(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 18403017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Designing a framework for the evaluation of paediatric telepsychiatry: a participatory approach. Boydell KM; Greenberg N; Volpe T J Telemed Telecare; 2004; 10(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 15165443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]