These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19822462)

  • 1. The influence of leg-to-body ratio (LBR) on judgments of female physical attractiveness: assessments of computer-generated images varying in LBR.
    Frederick DA; Hadji-Michael M; Furnham A; Swami V
    Body Image; 2010 Jan; 7(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 19822462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does hunger influence judgments of female physical attractiveness?
    Swami V; Tovée MJ
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Aug; 97(Pt 3):353-63. PubMed ID: 16848948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The leg-to-body ratio as a human aesthetic criterion.
    Swami V; Einon D; Furnham A
    Body Image; 2006 Dec; 3(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 18089235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Leg-to-Body Ratio on Body Shape Attractiveness.
    Kiire S
    Arch Sex Behav; 2016 May; 45(4):901-10. PubMed ID: 26474977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Judging the differences between women's attractiveness and health: is there really a difference between judgments made by men and women?
    Stephen ID; Perera AT
    Body Image; 2014 Mar; 11(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 24405818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating self and partner physical attractiveness.
    Swami V; Furnham A; Georgiades C; Pang L
    Body Image; 2007 Mar; 4(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 18089256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: a New Zealand-U.S. comparative study.
    Dixson BJ; Dixson AF; Bishop PJ; Parish A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Jun; 39(3):798-806. PubMed ID: 19139985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are preferences for legs length universal? Data from a semi-nomadic Himba population from Namibia.
    Sorokowski P; Sorokowska A; Mberira M
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 22558830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of group status on physical attractiveness preferences--from the Japanese case to a general cognitive perspective.
    Kowner R
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 1996 May; 122(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 8674998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More than just skin deep? Personality information influences men's ratings of the attractiveness of women's body sizes.
    Swami V; Furnham A; Chamorro-Premuzic T; Akbar K; Gordon N; Harris T; Finch J; Tovée MJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(6):628-47. PubMed ID: 21166328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eye-tracking of men's preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women.
    Dixson BJ; Grimshaw GM; Linklater WL; Dixson AF
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Feb; 40(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19688590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.
    Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 21901646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental Study on Leg-to-Body Ratio Preferences.
    Sabiniewicz A; Sorokowska A; Oleszkiewicz A; Sorokowski P
    Coll Antropol; 2015 Sep; 39(3):529-34. PubMed ID: 26898046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of leg-to-body ratio on male attractiveness depends on the ecological validity of the figures.
    Versluys TMM; Skylark WJ
    R Soc Open Sci; 2017 Oct; 4(10):170399. PubMed ID: 29134061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Body images of patients with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and female control subjects: a comparison with male ideals of female attractiveness.
    Benninghoven D; Raykowski L; Solzbacher S; Kunzendorf S; Jantschek G
    Body Image; 2007 Mar; 4(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 18089251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preference for attractiveness and thinness in a partner: influence of internalization of the thin ideal and shape/weight dissatisfaction in heterosexual women, heterosexual men, lesbians, and gay men.
    Legenbauer T; Vocks S; Schäfer C; Schütt-Strömel S; Hiller W; Wagner C; Vögele C
    Body Image; 2009 Jun; 6(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 19443281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of feminist ascription on judgements of women's physical attractiveness.
    Swami V; Salem N; Furnham A; Tovée MJ
    Body Image; 2008 Jun; 5(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 18280228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: tracking down the "beauty is beastly" effect.
    Johnson SK; Podratz KE; Dipboye RL; Gibbons E
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(3):301-18. PubMed ID: 20575336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Unger L; Little AC; Feinberg DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1420-30. PubMed ID: 18085954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants and consequences of female attractiveness and sexiness: realistic tests with restaurant waitresses.
    Lynn M
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Oct; 38(5):737-45. PubMed ID: 18543091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.