These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19822987)

  • 1. Effect of fiber-premixed indirect resin composite substructure on fracture resistance of MOD composite inlays adhered with two different adhesive resin cements.
    Minami H; Suzuki S; Murahara S; Saimi Y; Minesaki Y; Tanaka T
    Dent Mater J; 2009 Sep; 28(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 19822987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin inlays.
    Salaverry A; Borges GA; Mota EG; Burnett Júnior LH; Spohr AM
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Dec; 15(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 23653900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of oxalate desensitizer with different resin cement-retained indirect composite inlays on fracture resistance of teeth.
    Shafiei F; Alavi AA; Karimi F; Ansarifard E
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 23279061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tensile bond strength and flexural modulus of resin cements--influence on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlays.
    Habekost Lde V; Camacho GB; Demarco FF; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 17910226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance and gap formation of MOD restorations: influence of restorative technique, bevel preparation and water storage.
    Coelho-De-Souza FH; Camacho GB; Demarco FF; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 18335731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of light-activated and auto- and dual-polymerizing adhesive systems on bond strength of indirect composite resin to dentin.
    de Menezes MJ; Arrais CA; Giannini M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 16911888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
    Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
    Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance and microtensile bond strength of maxillary premolars restored with two resin composite inlay systems.
    Sun YS; Chen YM; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 18578176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of different adhesives on work of adhesion between CAD/CAM polymers and resin composite cements.
    Keul C; Müller-Hahl M; Eichberger M; Liebermann A; Roos M; Edelhoff D; Stawarczyk B
    J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1105-14. PubMed ID: 24613606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods.
    Mergulhão VA; de Mendonça LS; de Albuquerque MS; Braz R
    Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
    Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent.
    Blatz MB; Sadan A; Arch GH; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 12690351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of proximal box elevation on bond strength of composite inlays.
    Da Silva Gonçalves D; Cura M; Ceballos L; Fuentes MV
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):247-254. PubMed ID: 26969499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shear bond strength of tooth-colored indirect restorations bonded to coronal and cervical enamel.
    Shimada Y; Tomimatsu N; Suzuki T; Uzzaman MA; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(4):468-73. PubMed ID: 16130867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth.
    Yasa B; Arslan H; Yasa E; Akcay M; Hatirli H
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 25982519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.