These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19823554)

  • 41. Investigating the utility of clinical assessments to predict success with presbyopic contact lens correction.
    Sivardeen A; Laughton D; Wolffsohn JS
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):322-30. PubMed ID: 27237964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Optical and Visual Quality With Physical and Visually Simulated Presbyopic Multifocal Contact Lenses.
    Vinas M; Aissati S; Gonzalez-Ramos AM; Romero M; Sawides L; Akondi V; Gambra E; Dorronsoro C; Karkkainen T; Nankivil D; Marcos S
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Sep; 9(10):20. PubMed ID: 33005478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The application of a computerised videokeratography (CVK) based contact lens fitting software programme on irregularly shaped corneal surfaces.
    Nosch DS; Ong GL; Mavrikakis I; Morris J
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Sep; 30(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 17689133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Bifocal contact lenses as a correction method in presbyopia].
    Avetisov SE; Rybakova EG; Egorova GB; Churkina MN; Borodina NV; Boev VI
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2003; 119(4):28-31. PubMed ID: 12934502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A comparison of small aperture implants providing increased depth of focus in pseudophakic eyes.
    Eppig T; Spira C; Seitz B; Szentmáry N; Langenbucher A
    Z Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 26(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 27017516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. To the editor: Stereoacuity with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Josephson J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 87(12):1057. PubMed ID: 21116164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparison of synergeyes versus traditional rigid gas permeable lens designs for patients with irregular corneas.
    Nau AC
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jul; 34(4):198-200. PubMed ID: 18787425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A novel method of fitting scleral lenses using high resolution optical coherence tomography.
    Gemoules G
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Mar; 34(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 18327042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Jupiter scleral lenses in the management of chronic graft versus host disease.
    Schornack MM; Baratz KH; Patel SV; Maguire LJ
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Nov; 34(6):302-5. PubMed ID: 18997537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Contact lens correction of presbyopia.
    Morgan PB; Efron N
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Aug; 32(4):191-2. PubMed ID: 19535284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 1. Optical performance evaluation via computed through-focus retinal image quality metrics.
    Bakaraju RC; Ehrmann K; Ho A
    J Optom; 2018; 11(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 28606456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Characteristic of binocular vision found for presbyopic patients wearing single vision contact lenses.
    Lebow KA; Goldberg JB
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1975 Nov; 46(11):1116-23. PubMed ID: 802938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Optical power distribution of refractive and aspheric multifocal contact lenses: Effect of pupil size.
    Madrid-Costa D; Ruiz-Alcocer J; García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Oct; 38(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 25899637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Contact lens fitting post-laser-in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
    Steele C; Davidson J
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 May; 30(2):84-93. PubMed ID: 17329148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Neuroadaptation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses.
    Pepin SM
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 19(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 18090890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Potential range of clear vision in monovision.
    Erickson P
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Mar; 59(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 3351187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Optical surface optimization for the correction of presbyopia.
    Dai GM
    Appl Opt; 2006 Jun; 45(17):4184-95. PubMed ID: 16761062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Spherical aberration in relation to visual performance in contact lens wear.
    Lindskoog Pettersson A; Mårtensson L; Salkic J; Unsbo P; Brautaset R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2011 Feb; 34(1):12-6; quiz 50-1. PubMed ID: 20926333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A quantitative and qualitative assessment of the NOVAWET-Perception bifocal contact lens.
    Anderson CW; Bierly JR; Litteral G; Gross J; Hainsworth D
    CLAO J; 1996 Apr; 22(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 8728616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Simulation of commercial vs theoretically optimised contact lenses for presbyopia.
    Legras R; Rio D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 28439978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.