These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19823879)
1. Architectural characteristics of the normal and deformity mandible revealed by three-dimensional functional unit analysis. Park W; Kim BC; Yu HS; Yi CK; Lee SH Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Dec; 14(6):691-8. PubMed ID: 19823879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Volumetric characteristics of prognathic mandible revealed by skeletal unit analysis. Mun SH; Park M; Lee J; Lim HJ; Kim BC Ann Anat; 2019 Nov; 226():3-9. PubMed ID: 31336151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism. You KH; Lee KJ; Lee SH; Baik HS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):540.e1-8; discussion 540-1. PubMed ID: 21055584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional vector analysis of mandibular structural asymmetry. Park KR; Park HS; Piao Z; Kim MK; Yu HS; Seo JK; Lee SH J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 41(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 23347884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel measurement method for the morphology of the mandibular ramus using homologous modelling. Inoue K; Nakano H; Sumida T; Yamada T; Otawa N; Fukuda N; Nakajima Y; Kumamaru W; Mishima K; Kouchi M; Takahashi I; Mori Y Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150062. PubMed ID: 26143939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mandibular growth comparisons of Class I and Class II division 1 skeletofacial patterns. Jacob HB; Buschang PH Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):755-61. PubMed ID: 24524578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of mandibular rami width in patients with prognathism and retrognathia. Ribeiro DP; Gandelmann IH; Medeiros PJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1506-9. PubMed ID: 16982309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tooth axis and skeletal structures in mandibular molar vertical sections in jaw deformity with facial asymmetry using MPR images. Nojima K; Yokose T; Ishii T; Kobayashi M; Nishii Y Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2007 Nov; 48(4):171-6. PubMed ID: 18360103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry--a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography. Kwon TG; Park HS; Ryoo HM; Lee SH Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15925488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of 2D:4D in subjects with anteroposterior mandibular dysplasia. Premkumar S; Gurumurthy B J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):582-5. PubMed ID: 24309331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery? Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in the dimensions of milled mandibular models after mandibular sagittal split osteotomies. Schultes G; Gaggl A; Kärcher H Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Jun; 36(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 9678885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robust and regional 3D facial asymmetry assessment in hemimandibular hyperplasia and hemimandibular elongation anomalies. Walters M; Claes P; Kakulas E; Clement JG Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22749574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques. Yang HJ; Lee WJ; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 20382051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major. Takriti M; Dashash M J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Curve of Spee and its relationship to vertical eruption of teeth among different malocclusion groups. Veli I; Ozturk MA; Uysal T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 25726397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition. Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA; Tollaro I Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 May; 111(5):502-9. PubMed ID: 9155809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new method to move mandible to intercuspal position in virtual three-dimensional orthognathic surgery by integrating primary occlusion model. Dai J; Wang X; Hu G; Shen SG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):e484-9. PubMed ID: 22907113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Spline analysis of the mandible in human subjects with class III malocclusion. Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S Arch Oral Biol; 1997 May; 42(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 9233843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]