These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19824756)

  • 1. Milgram, stress research, and the Institutional Review Board.
    Masters KS
    Am Psychol; 2009 Oct; 64(7):621-2. PubMed ID: 19824756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Obedience lite.
    Elms AC
    Am Psychol; 2009 Jan; 64(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 19209962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reflections on "Replicating Milgram" (Burger, 2009).
    Miller AG
    Am Psychol; 2009 Jan; 64(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 19209960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From New Haven to Santa Clara: A historical perspective on the Milgram obedience experiments.
    Blass T
    Am Psychol; 2009 Jan; 64(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 19209963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The power of the situation: The impact of Milgram's obedience studies on personality and social psychology.
    Benjamin LT; Simpson JA
    Am Psychol; 2009 Jan; 64(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 19209959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research with victims of disaster: institutional review board considerations.
    Collogan LK; Tuma FK; Fleischman AR
    IRB; 2004; 26(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 15449409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychological and social risks of behavioral research.
    Labott SM; Johnson TP
    IRB; 2004; 26(3):11-5. PubMed ID: 15281195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Teaching research ethics: illustrating the nature of the researcher-IRB relationship.
    Brinthaupt TM
    Teach Psychol; 2002; 29(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 15295829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An introduction to institutional review boards.
    Sims JM
    Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2008; 27(5):223-5. PubMed ID: 18724181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today?
    Burger JM
    Am Psychol; 2009 Jan; 64(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19209958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Review boards pose threat to tough work by social scientists.
    Begley S
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2002 Nov; ():B1. PubMed ID: 12474832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioral research involving children: a developmental perspective on risk.
    Thompson RA
    IRB; 1990; 12(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11650368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An ethics committee reflects; and research in the place where you work--some responses.
    Westhead H; Meyer J
    Bull Med Ethics; 2003 May; (188):20-2; author reply 22. PubMed ID: 14983862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protecting the human subjects of social science research--the role of institutional review boards.
    Reynolds D
    Bioethics Forum; 2000; 16(4):31-6. PubMed ID: 11902182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overcoming a primary barrier to practice-based research: Access to an institutional review board (IRB) for independent ethics review.
    Osborne TL; Luoma JB
    Psychotherapy (Chic); 2018 Sep; 55(3):255-262. PubMed ID: 30179032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A sociological study of informed consent in a university hospital: problems with the Institutional Review Board.
    Sorensen AA
    Clin Res; 1978 Jan; 26(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10304720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The forum. The importance of context in international research.
    Brunger F; Weijer C
    Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(4):371-2, 384-7. PubMed ID: 12678077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed consent: true information or institutional review board-approved disinformation?
    Rossel M; Burnier M; Stupp R
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Dec; 25(36):5835-6. PubMed ID: 18089884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
    Nelson CH; McPherson DH
    NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The forum. The challenges of cross-cultural research in the international setting.
    Crosby S; Grodin MA
    Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(4):371-2, 376-8. PubMed ID: 12678074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.