875 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19826025)
1. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.
Hu JC; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; Barry MJ; D'Amico AV; Weinberg AC; Keating NL
JAMA; 2009 Oct; 302(14):1557-64. PubMed ID: 19826025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in older men.
Adejoro O; Gupta P; Ziegelmann M; Weight C; Konety B
Urol Oncol; 2016 May; 34(5):234.e1-11. PubMed ID: 26795606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Temporal national trends of minimally invasive and retropubic radical prostatectomy outcomes from 2003 to 2007: results from the 100% Medicare sample.
Kowalczyk KJ; Levy JM; Caplan CF; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Gu X; Hu JC
Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):803-9. PubMed ID: 22209053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy surgeon volume.
Choi WW; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; D'Amico AV; Williams SB; Hu JC
Urol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 30(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 20822929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.
Hu JC; Hevelone ND; Ferreira MD; Lipsitz SR; Choueiri TK; Sanda MG; Earle CC
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1969-74. PubMed ID: 18801512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Prasad SM; Gu X; Lavelle R; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC
J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 21074198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative effectiveness, cost, and utilization of radical prostatectomy among young men within managed care insurance plans.
Shih YC; Ward JF; Pettaway CA; Xu Y; Matin SF; Davis JW; Thompson BP; Elting LS
Value Health; 2012; 15(2):367-75. PubMed ID: 22433769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Hu JC; Wang Q; Pashos CL; Lipsitz SR; Keating NL
J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(14):2278-84. PubMed ID: 18467718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radical prostatectomy innovation and outcomes at military and civilian institutions.
Leow JJ; Weissman JS; Kimsey L; Hoburg A; Helmchen LA; Jiang W; Hevelone N; Lipsitz SR; Nguyen LL; Chang SL
Am J Manag Care; 2017 Jun; 23(6):342-347. PubMed ID: 28817298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal trends in radical prostatectomy complications from 1991 to 1998.
Hu JC; Gold KF; Pashos CL; Mehta SS; Litwin MS
J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1443-8. PubMed ID: 12629380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The association of lymph node dissection with 30-day perioperative morbidity among men undergoing minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP).
Brito J; Pereira J; Moreira DM; Pareek G; Tucci C; Guo R; Zhang Z; Amin A; Mega A; Renzulli J; Golijanin D; Gershman B
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 29858588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variations in surgeon volume and use of pelvic lymph node dissection with open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Prasad SM; Keating NL; Wang Q; Pashos CL; Lipsitz S; Richie JP; Hu JC
Urology; 2008 Sep; 72(3):647-52; discussion 652-3. PubMed ID: 18649928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The diffusion of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in the United States: a case study of the introduction of new surgical devices.
Anderson CB; Elkin EB; Atoria CL; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Touijer K
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2015 Mar; 18(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 25512262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complications after radical retropubic prostatectomy in the medicare population.
Benoit RM; Naslund MJ; Cohen JK
Urology; 2000 Jul; 56(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 10869638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.
Liu JJ; Maxwell BG; Panousis P; Chung BI
Urology; 2013 Sep; 82(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 23876584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is Radical Perineal Prostatectomy a Viable Therapeutic Option for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer?
Lee HW; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY
J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1631-7. PubMed ID: 26539008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy gives favourable surgical and functional outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate.
Palisaar JR; Wenske S; Sommerer F; Hinkel A; Noldus J
BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 19298408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A population-based analysis of temporal perioperative complication rates after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Schmitges J; Trinh QD; Abdollah F; Sun M; Bianchi M; Budäus L; Zorn K; Perotte P; Schlomm T; Haese A; Montorsi F; Menon M; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):564-71. PubMed ID: 21723034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.
Trinh QD; Sammon J; Sun M; Ravi P; Ghani KR; Bianchi M; Jeong W; Shariat SF; Hansen J; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Rogers CG; Peabody JO; Montorsi F; Menon M; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):679-85. PubMed ID: 22206800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
