These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1982690)

  • 1. Effects of low doses of neuroleptics on temporal regulation in a differential reinforcement of response duration (DRRD) schedule in the dog.
    Bruhwyler J; Chleide E; Mercier M
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1990 Dec; 37(4):607-11. PubMed ID: 1982690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of the behavioral, neurophysiological, and motor effects of psychotropic drugs in the dog.
    Bruhwyler J; Chleide E
    Biol Psychiatry; 1990 Jun; 27(11):1264-78. PubMed ID: 1972339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Amineptine improves the performance of dogs in a complex temporal regulation schedule.
    Bruhwyler J; Chleide E; Rettori MC; Poignant JC; Mercier M
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1993 Aug; 45(4):897-903. PubMed ID: 8105491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of neuroleptics on rate and duration of operant versus reflexive licking in rats.
    Gramling SE; Fowler SC
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1985 Apr; 22(4):541-5. PubMed ID: 2859612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of amisulpride and aripiprazole on progressive-ratio schedule performance: comparison with clozapine and haloperidol.
    den Boon FS; Body S; Hampson CL; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E; de Bruin N
    J Psychopharmacol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1231-43. PubMed ID: 21969105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differentiation of haloperidol and clozapine using a complex operant schedule in the dog.
    Bruhwyler J; Chleide E; Houbeau G; Waegeneer N; Mercier M
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1993 Jan; 44(1):181-9. PubMed ID: 8430121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential effects of imipramine in rats as a function of DRL schedule value.
    McGuire PS; Seiden LS
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1980 Nov; 13(5):691-4. PubMed ID: 7443738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison between lick or lever-pressing contingent reward and the effects of neuroleptics thereon.
    Wauquier A; Niemegeers CJ
    Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther; 1979 Jun; 239(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 39532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of operant response duration to distinguish the effects of haloperidol from nonreward.
    Faustman WO; Fowler SC
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1981 Aug; 15(2):327-9. PubMed ID: 7312904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blockade by neuroleptics of water intake and operant responding for water in the rat: anhedonia, motor deficit, or both?
    Ljungberg T
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1987 Jun; 27(2):341-50. PubMed ID: 2888135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reward, performance, and the response strength method in self-stimulating rats: validation and neuroleptics.
    Hamilton AL; Stellar JR; Hart EB
    Physiol Behav; 1985 Dec; 35(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 2869532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Schedule-dependent effects of haloperidol and amphetamine: multiple-schedule task shows within-subject effects.
    Caul WF; Brindle NA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2001 Jan; 68(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 11274708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs on response decrement patterns in rats.
    Sanger DJ; Perrault G
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1995 Feb; 272(2):708-13. PubMed ID: 7531764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioral deficits induced by low doses of apomorphine in rats: evidence for a motivational and cognitive dysfunction which discriminates among neuroleptic drugs.
    Carnoy P; Ravard S; Wemerman B; Soubrie P; Simon P
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1986 Sep; 25(3):503-9. PubMed ID: 2877466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of aripiprazole on operant responding for a natural reward after psychostimulant withdrawal in rats.
    Schwabe K; Koch M
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Apr; 191(3):759-65. PubMed ID: 16953383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dopamine in the orbitofrontal cortex regulates operant responding under a progressive ratio of reinforcement in rats.
    Cetin T; Freudenberg F; Füchtemeier M; Koch M
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Nov; 370(2-3):114-7. PubMed ID: 15488305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of amphetamine on differential reinforcement of low rates of responding.
    Saulsgiver KA; McClure EA; Wynne CD
    Behav Pharmacol; 2007 Mar; 18(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 17351419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential effects of clozapine, metoclopramide, haloperidol and risperidone on acquisition and performance of operant responding in rats.
    Baker TW; Florczynski MM; Beninger RJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2015 May; 232(9):1535-43. PubMed ID: 25381749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 72-second schedule: selective effects of antidepressant drugs.
    O'Donnell JM; Seiden LS
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1983 Jan; 224(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 6848751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bombesin improves rats' operant responding maintained by a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rates schedule of food reinforcement.
    Bowers RL; Harris-Peterson M; Mollenhauer MS; DeVolder C; Avery DD; Richards RW
    Psychol Rep; 1990 Feb; 66(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 2326405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.