416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19827376)
1. ["Open comparisons" no reliable measures of the quality of care in myocardial infarction. The epidemiological registry is not sufficient for county comparisons].
Ryttberg B; Nyström E; Stenberg A; Palm K; Näslund I
Lakartidningen; 2009 Aug 26-Sep 1; 106(35):2121-4. PubMed ID: 19827376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The use of a check list for quality assurance of the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the coronary care unit].
Meinardi F; Steffenino G; Ugliengo G; Vado A; Conte E; Deorsola A; Menardi E; Giordano P; Rizzotti M; Uslenghi E
G Ital Cardiol; 1996 Dec; 26(12):1375-83. PubMed ID: 9162667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Analysis of myocardial infarction mortality: open comparisons give better picture than Riks-HIA].
Björck S; Torgerson JS
Lakartidningen; 2009 Oct 7-13; 106(41):2622-3. PubMed ID: 19927928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Current patient records systems not sufficient as a basis for ranking lists].
Ryttberg B; Nyström E; Stenberg A; Palm K; Näslund I
Lakartidningen; 2009 Oct 7-13; 106(41):2623. PubMed ID: 19927929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Mortality an uncertain indicator in quality comparisons].
Björck S; Förars M
Lakartidningen; 2008 Aug 27-Sep 2; 105(35):2349. PubMed ID: 18831445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [A model for study of quality of myocardial infarction care. Distinct targets improve the care].
Forslund L; Kahan T; Nilsson R; Norhagen PH; Adamson U
Lakartidningen; 1996 Oct; 93(42):3697-700. PubMed ID: 8965533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Care of myocardial infarction strongly improved 1995-2005. Quality registry, open statements and clear therapeutic goals have payed off].
Stenestrand U; Lindahl B; Wallentin L
Lakartidningen; 2007 May 14-29; 104(20-21):1580-3. PubMed ID: 17564264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Reduced prestige, cooperation over the clinical boundaries, increased dialogue with the politicians. The coronary center in Linköping further develops the quality work].
Aldstedt E
Lakartidningen; 1998 Jun; 95(25):2922-5. PubMed ID: 9674359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Quality projects of the Swedish registry on heart surgery. To study other clinics is to learn, not to judge].
Arén C
Lakartidningen; 1999 May; 96(20):2498-502. PubMed ID: 10380497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Heart infarction care under the magnifying glass. The open county-wise comparisons must be improved and become more reliable].
Herlitz J
Lakartidningen; 2009 Aug 26-Sep 1; 106(35):2117. PubMed ID: 19827374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Care during the initial phase of suspected myocardial infarct. Lack of knowledge results in deficient treatment].
Herlitz J
Lakartidningen; 1997 Jul; 94(28-29):2536-8. PubMed ID: 9254318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Heart infarction registry or the art of medicine--can they be united?].
Lindström K; Järhult B
Lakartidningen; 2007 Aug 8-21; 104(32-33):2258-9; discussion 2259-62. PubMed ID: 17822206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [National quality registry for in-hospital cardiac arrest now started].
Herlitz H; Svensson L; Aune S; Lindqvist J; Svensson CJ
Lakartidningen; 2007 Nov 7-13; 104(45):3361-4. PubMed ID: 18062636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Health data registries necessary for follow-up of the quality of health care!].
Köster M; Ljung R; Aberg A; Heurgren M
Lakartidningen; 2009 Sep 16-22; 106(38):2380. PubMed ID: 19848346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Project hinges on top quality hospital data.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2003 May; 28(5):67-9. PubMed ID: 12747241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Central registries in health care. Are they reliable?].
Carlsson P
Lakartidningen; 1994 Feb; 91(7):582, 587. PubMed ID: 8114593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved outlook for patients with acute myocardial infarction: an interim progress report.
Califf RM; Harrington RA
Eur Heart J; 1998 Oct; 19(10):1416-8. PubMed ID: 9820980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The dissociation between door-to-balloon time improvement and improvements in other acute myocardial infarction care processes and patient outcomes.
Wang TY; Fonarow GC; Hernandez AF; Liang L; Ellrodt G; Nallamothu BK; Shah BR; Cannon CP; Peterson ED
Arch Intern Med; 2009 Aug; 169(15):1411-9. PubMed ID: 19667305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. NRMI (National Registry of Myocardial Infarction) data impacts care on many different levels.
Healthc Benchmarks; 2002 Mar; 9(3):27, 29-31. PubMed ID: 11915161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hospital interventions improve care of North Carolina Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Sueta CA; Schenck A; Hall R; Simpson RJ
N C Med J; 2001; 62(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 11270306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
