BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19827885)

  • 1. Positive margin prevalence and risk factors with cervical specimens obtained from loop electrosurgical excision procedures and cold knife conization.
    Panna S; Luanratanakorn S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(4):637-40. PubMed ID: 19827885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevalence and risk factors for residual cervical neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP or conization.
    Natee J; Therasakvichaya S; Boriboonhirunsarn D
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88(10):1344-8. PubMed ID: 16519377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
    Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen.
    Huang LW; Hwang JL
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10094873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision.
    Miroshnichenko GG; Parva M; Holtz DO; Klemens JA; Dunton CJ
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 19098600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
    Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin after LEEP conization: A retrospective study.
    Abdulaziz AMA; You X; Liu L; Sun Y; Zhang J; Sun S; Li X; Sun W; Dong Y; Liu H; Zhang Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 May; 100(20):e26030. PubMed ID: 34011112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
    Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cold knife conization vs. LEEP. Are they the same procedure?
    Fanning J; Padratzik J
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 11838307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Diagnosis and treatment value of colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of 135 cases].
    Xiao FY; Wang Q; Zheng RL; Chen M; Su TT; Sui L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 51(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 27030497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The risk factors of residual lesions and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive-margin after conization.
    Chen JY; Wang ZL; Wang ZY; Yang XS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12792. PubMed ID: 30313104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
    Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk for residual adenocarcinoma in situ or cervical adenocarcinoma in women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure/conization for adenocarcinoma in situ.
    DeSimone CP; Day ME; Dietrich CS; Tovar MM; Modesitt SC
    J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(9-10):376-80. PubMed ID: 22010519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].
    Hillemanns P; Kimmig R; Dannecker C; Noorzai T; Diebold J; Thaler CJ; Hepp H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10785949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a comparison of loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization.
    Latif NA; Neubauer NL; Helenowski IB; Lurain JR
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Apr; 19(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 25089550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical significance of loop electrosurgical excisional procedure in diagnosis and treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ and invasive cervical adenocarcinoma].
    Song Y; Wang Q; Sui L; Gao SJ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):178-182. PubMed ID: 29609232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors influencing the choice between cold knife conization and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Shin JW; Rho HS; Park CY
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 19215559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pathologic risk factors for predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP conization.
    Kim HJ; Kim KR; Mok JE; Nam JH; Kim YT; Kim YM; Kim JH; Yun SC
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 May; 105(2):434-8. PubMed ID: 17303228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Relationship between various histological status of margins of LEEP and residual HSIL or worse at hysterectomy following conization].
    Xiao YP; Tao X; Zhao CY; Qu YQ; Xie F; Ning Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 30695901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compliance after loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife cone biopsy.
    Greenspan DL; Faubion M; Coonrod DV; Hart KW; Mathieson K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):675-80. PubMed ID: 17766617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.