187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19828229)
1. Dual frequency method for simultaneous translation and real-time imaging of ultrasound contrast agents within large blood vessels.
Patil AV; Rychak JJ; Allen JS; Klibanov AL; Hossack JA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 35(12):2021-30. PubMed ID: 19828229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microcirculation volumetric flow assessment using high-resolution, contrast-assisted images.
Yeh CK; Lu SY; Chen YS
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jan; 55(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 18334315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of flow using ultrasound and microbubbles: a disruption replenishment model based on physical principles.
Hudson JM; Karshafian R; Burns PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 35(12):2007-20. PubMed ID: 19822390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Directional velocity estimation using a spatio-temporal encoding technique based on frequency division for synthetic transmit aperture ultrasound.
Gran F; Jensen JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1289-99. PubMed ID: 16889336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative real-time blood flow estimation with intravascular ultrasound in the presence of in-plane flow.
de Ana FJ; O'Donnell M
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Nov; 52(11):1952-61. PubMed ID: 16422407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound imaging velocimetry: effect of beam sweeping on velocity estimation.
Zhou B; Fraser KH; Poelma C; Mari JM; Eckersley RJ; Weinberg PD; Tang MX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1672-81. PubMed ID: 23791353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microbubble oscillating in a microvessel filled with viscous fluid: A finite element modeling study.
Chen C; Gu Y; Tu J; Guo X; Zhang D
Ultrasonics; 2016 Mar; 66():54-64. PubMed ID: 26651263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3-D Velocity and Volume Flow Measurement In Vivo Using Speckle Decorrelation and 2-D High-Frame-Rate Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.
Zhou X; Leow CH; Rowland E; Riemer K; Rubin JM; Weinberg PD; Tang MX
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Dec; 65(12):2233-2244. PubMed ID: 29994672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flow quantification with nakagami parametric imaging for suppressing contrast microbubbles attenuation.
Gu X; Wei M; Zong Y; Jiang H; Wan M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):660-9. PubMed ID: 23384469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A sensitive ultrasonic imaging method for targeted contrast microbubble detection.
Zheng H; Kruse DE; Stephens DN; Ferrara KW; Sutcliffe P; Gardner E
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():5290-3. PubMed ID: 19163911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optical Verification of Microbubble Response to Acoustic Radiation Force in Large Vessels With In Vivo Results.
Wang S; Wang CY; Unnikrishnan S; Klibanov AL; Hossack JA; Mauldin FW
Invest Radiol; 2015 Nov; 50(11):772-84. PubMed ID: 26135018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual high-frequency difference excitation for contrast detection.
Yeh CK; Su SY; Shen CC; Li ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Oct; 55(10):2164-76. PubMed ID: 18986865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intravascular ultrasound catheter to enhance microbubble-based drug delivery via acoustic radiation force.
Kilroy JP; Klibanov AL; Wamhoff BR; Hossack J
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Oct; 59(10):2156-66. PubMed ID: 23143566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A simple method for quantifying ultrasound-triggered microbubble destruction.
Hung SH; Yeh CK; Tsai TH; Chen T; Chen RC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):949-57. PubMed ID: 21546152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method for differentiating targeted microbubbles in real time using subharmonic micro-ultrasound and interframe filtering.
Needles A; Couture O; Foster FS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1564-73. PubMed ID: 19632763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selective imaging of adherent targeted ultrasound contrast agents.
Zhao S; Kruse DE; Ferrara KW; Dayton PA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2055-72. PubMed ID: 17404455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microbubble Void Imaging: A Non-invasive Technique for Flow Visualisation and Quantification of Mixing in Large Vessels Using Plane Wave Ultrasound and Controlled Microbubble Contrast Agent Destruction.
Leow CH; Iori F; Corbett R; Duncan N; Caro C; Vincent P; Tang MX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2926-37. PubMed ID: 26297515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Velocity field estimation in transcranial small vessel using super-resolution ultrasound imaging velocimetry.
Liang M; Liu J; Guo C; Zong Y; Wan M
Ultrasonics; 2023 Jul; 132():107016. PubMed ID: 37094521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advantages in using multi-frequency driving ultrasound for optimizing echo particle image velocimetry techniques.
Zheng H; Mukdadi O; Hertzberg J; Shandas R
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():371-6. PubMed ID: 15133986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microbubble destruction by dual-high-frequency ultrasound excitation.
Yeh CK; Su SY; Shen CC
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 May; 56(5):1113-8. PubMed ID: 19473929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
