208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19828738)
1. Comparison of MRSASelect Agar, CHROMagar Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Medium, and Xpert MRSA PCR for detection of MRSA in Nares: diagnostic accuracy for surveillance samples with various bacterial densities.
Wolk DM; Marx JL; Dominguez L; Driscoll D; Schifman RB
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 47(12):3933-6. PubMed ID: 19828738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of three chromogenic media combined with broth enrichment and the real-time PCR-based Xpert MRSA assay for screening of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in nasal swabs.
Lee S; Park YJ; Park KG; Jekarl DW; Chae H; Yoo JK; Seo SW; Choi JE; Lim JH; Heo SM; Seo JH
Ann Lab Med; 2013 Jul; 33(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 23826561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-way comparison of BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, MRSASelect, and spectra MRSA for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in nasal surveillance cultures.
Denys GA; Renzi PB; Koch KM; Wissel CM
J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Jan; 51(1):202-5. PubMed ID: 23135930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multicenter evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) test as a rapid screening method for detection of MRSA in nares.
Wolk DM; Picton E; Johnson D; Davis T; Pancholi P; Ginocchio CC; Finegold S; Welch DF; de Boer M; Fuller D; Solomon MC; Rogers B; Mehta MS; Peterson LR
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 47(3):758-64. PubMed ID: 19129414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative assessment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus diagnostic assays for use in resource-limited settings.
Ayebare A; Bebell LM; Bazira J; Ttendo S; Katawera V; Bangsberg DR; Siedner MJ; Firth PG; Boum Ii Y
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):194. PubMed ID: 31438852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Xpert MRSA assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from nares swabs of geriatric hospitalized patients and failure to detect a specific SCCmec type IV variant.
Laurent C; Bogaerts P; Schoevaerdts D; Denis O; Deplano A; Swine C; Struelens MJ; Glupczynski Y
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2010 Aug; 29(8):995-1002. PubMed ID: 20512518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in specimens from various body sites: performance characteristics of the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay, the Xpert MRSA assay, and broth-enriched culture in an area with a low prevalence of MRSA infections.
Hombach M; Pfyffer GE; Roos M; Lucke K
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Nov; 48(11):3882-7. PubMed ID: 20861339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multicenter evaluation of the LightCycler methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) advanced test as a rapid method for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance swabs.
Peterson LR; Liesenfeld O; Woods CW; Allen SD; Pombo D; Patel PA; Mehta MS; Nicholson B; Fuller D; Onderdonk A
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 May; 48(5):1661-6. PubMed ID: 20335423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of chromogenic media to BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR for detection of MRSA in nasal swabs.
Bischof LJ; Lapsley L; Fontecchio K; Jacosalem D; Young C; Hankerd R; Newton DW
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Jul; 47(7):2281-3. PubMed ID: 19439540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of rapid screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on the identification and earlier isolation of MRSA-positive patients.
Creamer E; Dolan A; Sherlock O; Thomas T; Walsh J; Moore J; Smyth E; O'Neill E; Shore A; Sullivan D; Rossney AS; Cunney R; Coleman D; Humphreys H
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 31(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 20184438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicenter Evaluation of MRSASelect II Chromogenic Agar for Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Wound and Nasal Specimens.
Hernandez DR; Newton DW; Ledeboer NA; Buchan B; Young C; Clark AE; Connoly J; Wolk DM
J Clin Microbiol; 2016 Feb; 54(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 26582836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of chromogenic media for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Malhotra-Kumar S; Abrahantes JC; Sabiiti W; Lammens C; Vercauteren G; Ieven M; Molenberghs G; Aerts M; Goossens H;
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Apr; 48(4):1040-6. PubMed ID: 20164268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of brilliance MRSA 2 agar for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in clinical samples.
Veenemans J; Verhulst C; Punselie R; van Keulen PH; Kluytmans JA
J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Mar; 51(3):1026-7. PubMed ID: 23284023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR assay to culture by use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance cultures from intensive care unit patients.
Snyder JW; Munier GK; Johnson CL
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Apr; 48(4):1305-9. PubMed ID: 20181916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicenter evaluation of BBL CHROMagar MRSA medium for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surveillance cultures of the anterior nares.
Flayhart D; Hindler JF; Bruckner DA; Hall G; Shrestha RK; Vogel SA; Richter SS; Howard W; Walther R; Carroll KC
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Nov; 43(11):5536-40. PubMed ID: 16272482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of a new chromogenic medium, BBL CHROMagar MRSA II (BD), for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in screening samples.
Van Vaerenbergh K; Cartuyvels R; Coppens G; Frans J; Van den Abeele AM; De Beenhouwer H;
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Apr; 48(4):1450-1. PubMed ID: 20181915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variable performance of four commercial chromogenic media for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates harbouring mecC.
Dupieux C; Kolenda C; Larsen AR; Pichon B; Holmes M; Bes M; Teale C; Dickson E; Hill R; Skov R; Kearns A; Laurent F
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2017 Aug; 50(2):263-265. PubMed ID: 28549606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chromogenic media vs real-time PCR for nasal surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: impact on detection of MRSA-positive persons.
Paule SM; Mehta M; Hacek DM; Gonzalzles TM; Robicsek A; Peterson LR
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Apr; 131(4):532-9. PubMed ID: 19289589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicenter Evaluation of the Xpert MRSA NxG Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Nasal Swabs.
Yarbrough ML; Warren DK; Allen K; Burkholder D; Daum R; Donskey C; Knaack D; LaMarca A; May L; Miller LG; Parenti DM; Peterson L; Tan TY; Widen R; Hernandez DR; Wolk DM; Burnham CA
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29118165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative Evaluation of Two PCR-Based Methods for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): Xpert MRSA Gen 3 and BD-Max MRSA XT.
Lepainteur M; Delattre S; Cozza S; Lawrence C; Roux AL; Rottman M
J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Jun; 53(6):1955-8. PubMed ID: 25878336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
