BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19829164)

  • 1. Bringing in the negative reinforcements: the avoidance feedback-related negativity.
    Crowley MJ; Wu J; Bailey CA; Mayes LC
    Neuroreport; 2009 Nov; 20(17):1513-7. PubMed ID: 19829164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mediofrontal event-related potentials in response to positive, negative and unsigned prediction errors.
    Sambrook TD; Goslin J
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Aug; 61():1-10. PubMed ID: 24946315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feedback-related negativity is enhanced in adolescence during a gambling task with and without probabilistic reinforcement learning.
    Martínez-Velázquez ES; Ramos-Loyo J; González-Garrido AA; Sequeira H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Jan; 26(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 25494471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials.
    Pfabigan DM; Alexopoulos J; Bauer H; Sailer U
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 21039585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mediofrontal negativities in the absence of responding.
    Donkers FC; Nieuwenhuis S; van Boxtel GJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):777-87. PubMed ID: 16249075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Knowing good from bad: differential activation of human cortical areas by positive and negative outcomes.
    Nieuwenhuis S; Slagter HA; von Geusau NJ; Heslenfeld DJ; Holroyd CB
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 21(11):3161-8. PubMed ID: 15978024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. System justification and electrophysiological responses to feedback: support for a positivity bias.
    Tritt SM; Page-Gould E; Peterson JB; Inzlicht M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1004-10. PubMed ID: 24274321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity.
    Bellebaum C; Daum I
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 27(7):1823-35. PubMed ID: 18380674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.
    Liu Y; Nelson LD; Bernat EM; Gehring WJ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 24673119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medial frontal negativity reflects learning from positive feedback.
    Van Der Helden J; Boksem MA
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Aug; 49(8):1109-13. PubMed ID: 22725655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. State sadness reduces neural sensitivity to nonrewards versus rewards.
    Foti D; Hajcak G
    Neuroreport; 2010 Jan; 21(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 20010444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations.
    Bellebaum C; Polezzi D; Daum I
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3343-50. PubMed ID: 20655319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Event-related components of the punishment and reward sensitivity.
    De Pascalis V; Varriale V; D'Antuono L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 121(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 19900840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociated roles of the anterior cingulate cortex in reward and conflict processing as revealed by the feedback error-related negativity and N200.
    Baker TE; Holroyd CB
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Apr; 87(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 21295109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frontal cortical effects on feedback processing and reinforcement learning: Relation of EEG asymmetry with the feedback-related negativity and behavior.
    Schmid PC; Hackel LM; Jasperse L; Amodio DM
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jan; 55(1):. PubMed ID: 28675507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The feedback-related negativity signals salience prediction errors, not reward prediction errors.
    Talmi D; Atkinson R; El-Deredy W
    J Neurosci; 2013 May; 33(19):8264-9. PubMed ID: 23658166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of the magnitude, probability, and valence of potential wins and losses on the amplitude of the feedback negativity.
    Kreussel L; Hewig J; Kretschmer N; Hecht H; Coles MG; Miltner WH
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Feb; 49(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 22091824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An electrophysiological monetary incentive delay (e-MID) task: a way to decompose the different components of neural response to positive and negative monetary reinforcement.
    Broyd SJ; Richards HJ; Helps SK; Chronaki G; Bamford S; Sonuga-Barke EJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Jul; 209(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 22659003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An electrophysiological analysis of coaching in Blackjack.
    Hewig J; Trippe RH; Hecht H; Coles MG; Holroyd CB; Miltner WH
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1197-205. PubMed ID: 18761133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Valence-separated representation of reward prediction error in feedback-related negativity and positivity.
    Bai Y; Katahira K; Ohira H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Feb; 26(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 25634316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.