These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19830973)
1. Comparing microleakage and the layering methods of silorane-based resin composite in wide Class II MOD cavities. Bagis YH; Baltacioglu IH; Kahyaogullari S Oper Dent; 2009; 34(5):578-85. PubMed ID: 19830973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage evaluation of Silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composite in class II box preparations using two different layering techniques: an in vitro study. Joseph A; Santhosh L; Hegde J; Panchajanya S; George R Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):148. PubMed ID: 23852255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations. Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems. Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites. Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations. Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of silorane-based composite and nanohybrid composite with or without polyethylene fiber inserts in class II restorations: an in vitro study. Agrawal VS; Parekh VV; Shah NC Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-7. PubMed ID: 22616928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in Class II cavities of various resin composites. Civelek A; Ersoy M; L'Hotelier E; Soyman M; Say EC Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 14531612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations. Attar N; Korkmaz Y J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements. Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the cervical integrity during occlusal loading of Class II restorations. Campos PE; Barceleiro Mde O; Sampaio-Filho HR; Martins LR Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18335734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations. Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: an in vitro study. Neme AM; Maxson BB; Pink FE; Aksu MN Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 12413226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polymerization shrinkage of different types of composite resins and microleakage with and without liner in class II cavities. Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 24147747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide. Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Handpieces for Class II Preparation and Microleakage of Silorane- or Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations. Ergin E; Oz FD; Gurgan S Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Sep; 36(9):499-505. PubMed ID: 30188252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of marginal microleakage in class II cavities: effect of microhybrid, flowable, and compactable resins. Peris AR; Duarte S; de Andrade MF Quintessence Int; 2003 Feb; 34(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 12666857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in Class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage. Ghavamnasiri M; Moosavi H; Tahvildarnejad N J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 17277834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of location of the gingival margin on the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites. Ozel E; Korkmaz Y; Attar N J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):65-72. PubMed ID: 18997918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]