These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19830973)

  • 21. Effect of fiber reinforcement on microleakage of class II cavities restored with a novel G-aenial posterior composite, silorane composite, and nanohybrid composite: an in vitro comparative study.
    Agrawal V; Kapoor S
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 May; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 26748965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations--Part II.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A; Ghosn C; Khraisat A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2009 Jun; 32(126):29-37. PubMed ID: 20069964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Composite restorations: influence of flowable and self-curing resin composite linings on microleakage in vitro.
    Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 12413221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
    Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cervical microleakage in MOD restorations: in vitro comparison of indirect and direct composite.
    Duquia Rde C; Osinaga PW; Demarco FF; de V Habekost L; Conceição EN
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):682-7. PubMed ID: 17153977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A study of microleakage in Class II composite restorations using four different curing techniques.
    Gharizadeh N; Moradi K; Haghighizadeh MH
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 17695605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gingival microleakage of Class II resin composite restorations with fiber inserts.
    El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Eltanty A; Abbasi K; Habib N
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 17555183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of placement techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class V composite restorations.
    Sensi LG; Marson FC; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Junior S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov; 6(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 16299603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of different placement techniques on the microtensile bond strength of low-shrink silorane composite bonded to Class I cavities.
    Almeida e Silva JS; Rolla JN; Baratieri LN; Monteiro S
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):e233-7. PubMed ID: 22313929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of fiber inserts, type of composite, and gingival margin location on the microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations.
    Dhingra V; Taneja S; Kumar M; Kumari M
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 23802641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage evaluation of a new low-shrinkage composite restorative material.
    Yamazaki PC; Bedran-Russo AK; Pereira PN; Wsift EJ
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):670-6. PubMed ID: 17153975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of cavosurface margin configuration of Class V cavity preparations on microleakage of composite resin restorations.
    Bagheri M; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 18264534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum.
    Demarco FF; Ramos OL; Mota CS; Formolo E; Justino LM
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 11357567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Flowable composites as "filled adhesives:" a microleakage study.
    Sensi LG; Marson FC; Monteiro S; Baratieri LN; Caldeira de Andrada MA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov; 5(4):32-41. PubMed ID: 15558088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of flowable composite lining on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations.
    Korkmaz Y; Ozel E; Attar N
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Apr; 9(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 17489480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Olmez A; Oztas N; Bodur H
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 15646229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparing microleakage and layering methods of silorane-based resin composite in class V cavities using confocal microscopy: An in vitro study.
    Usha H; Kumari A; Mehta D; Kaiwar A; Jain N
    J Conserv Dent; 2011 Apr; 14(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 21814359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.