410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19833568)
1. Total hip arthroplasty in severe segmental femoral bone loss situations: use of a reconstruction modular stem design (JVC IX). Retrospective study of 23 cases.
Bertani A; Helix M; Louis ML; Rochwerger A; Curvale G
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Nov; 95(7):491-7. PubMed ID: 19833568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are Complications Associated With the Repiphysis(®) Expandable Distal Femoral Prosthesis Acceptable for Its Continued Use?
Staals EL; Colangeli M; Ali N; Casanova JM; Donati DM; Manfrini M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):3003-13. PubMed ID: 25995179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term results of the ABG-1 hydroxyapatite coated total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 111 cases with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.
Bidar R; Kouyoumdjian P; Munini E; Asencio G
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Dec; 95(8):579-87. PubMed ID: 19926546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.
Benoist J; Lambotte JC; Polard JL; Huten D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 24211127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What Are the Long-term Results of MUTARS
Bus MP; van de Sande MA; Fiocco M; Schaap GR; Bramer JA; Dijkstra PD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):708-718. PubMed ID: 26649558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revision Distal Femoral Arthroplasty With the Compress(®) Prosthesis Has a Low Rate of Mechanical Failure at 10 Years.
Zimel MN; Farfalli GL; Zindman AM; Riedel ER; Morris CD; Boland PJ; Healey JH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):528-36. PubMed ID: 26394638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Proximal femoral reconstruction with megaprosthesis versus allograft prosthesis composite. A comparative study of functional results, complications and longevity in 41 cases].
Anract P; Coste J; Vastel L; Jeanrot C; Mascard E; Tomeno B
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 May; 86(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 10844358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cementless cups do not increase osteolysis risk in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Apropos of 106 cases.
Beldame J; Carreras F; Oger P; Beaufils P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Nov; 95(7):478-90. PubMed ID: 19801209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cementless femoral neck prosthesis CUT--clinical and radiological results after 5 years].
Steens W; Skripitz R; Schneeberger AG; Petzing I; Simon U; Goetze C
Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 20714982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proximal femoral replacement in contemporary revision total hip arthroplasty for severe femoral bone loss: a review of outcomes.
Viste A; Perry KI; Taunton MJ; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2017 Mar; 99-B(3):325-329. PubMed ID: 28249971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interlocking reconstruction-mode stem-sideplates preserve at-risk hips with short residual proximal femora.
Christ AB; Fujiwara T; Yakoub MA; Healey JH
Bone Joint J; 2021 Feb; 103-B(2):398-404. PubMed ID: 33517739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reconstruction of the proximal femur with a modular resection prosthesis.
Calabró T; Van Rooyen R; Piraino I; Pala E; Trovarelli G; Panagopoulos GN; Megaloikonomos PD; Angelini A; Mavrogenis AF; Ruggieri P
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 May; 26(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 27040404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [10-year survival of Zweymüller total prostheses in primary uncemented arthroplasty of the hip].
Delaunay C; Kapandji AI
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1998 Sep; 84(5):421-32. PubMed ID: 9805740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patch-grafting for regional femoral bone loss in cementless revision hip arthroplasty.
Hussell JG; Learmonth ID
S Afr J Surg; 1995 Dec; 33(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 8677472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Bone reconstruction, leg length discrepancy, and dislocation rate in 52 Wagner revision total hip arthroplasties at 44-month follow-up].
Boisgard S; Moreau PE; Tixier H; Levai JP
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Apr; 87(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 11319426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with extensive proximal femoral bone loss using a fluted tapered modular femoral component.
Amanatullah DF; Howard JL; Siman H; Trousdale RT; Mabry TM; Berry DJ
Bone Joint J; 2015 Mar; 97-B(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 25737513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complex revision total hip arthroplasty with modular stems at a mean of 14 years.
McCarthy JC; Lee JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():166-9. PubMed ID: 17891035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Custom-made segmental femoral replacement prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Malkani AL; Sim FH; Chao EY
Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):727-33. PubMed ID: 8414438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Modular noncemented femoral stem system in revision total hip arthroplasty].
Schofer MD; Efe T; Heyse TJ; Timmesfeld N; Velte R; Hinrichs F; Schmitt J
Orthopade; 2010 Feb; 39(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 19784618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
