These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19834882)
21. Determining the drift potential of Venturi nozzles compared with standard nozzles across three insecticide spray solutions in a wind tunnel. Ferguson JC; Chechetto RG; O'Donnell CC; Dorr GJ; Moore JH; Baker GJ; Powis KJ; Hewitt AJ Pest Manag Sci; 2016 Aug; 72(8):1460-6. PubMed ID: 26732308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of sprayer settings on spray drift during pesticide application in poplar plantations (Populus spp.). Grella M; Marucco P; Manzone M; Gallart M; Balsari P Sci Total Environ; 2017 Feb; 578():427-439. PubMed ID: 27836339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 4: a comparative study. Nuyttens D; Baetens K; De Schampheleire M; Sonck B Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 19226827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Wetting and deposition characteristics of air-assisted spray droplet on large broad-leaved crop canopy. Jiang Y; Yang Z; Xu X; Shen D; Jiang T; Xie B; Duan J Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1079703. PubMed ID: 36743480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Low-drift nozzles vs. standard nozzles for pesticide application in the biological efficacy trials of pesticides in apple pest and disease control. Doruchowski G; Świechowski W; Masny S; Maciesiak A; Tartanus M; Bryk H; Hołownicki R Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jan; 575():1239-1246. PubMed ID: 27720255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of sprayer speed, spray distance, and nozzle arrangement angle on low-flow air-assisted spray deposition. Dai S; Ou M; Du W; Yang X; Dong X; Jiang L; Zhang T; Ding S; Jia W Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1184244. PubMed ID: 37223814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Measuring Spray Droplet Size from Agricultural Nozzles Using Laser Diffraction. Fritz BK; Hoffmann WC J Vis Exp; 2016 Sep; (115):. PubMed ID: 27684589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of a new air-assisted sprayer and two conventional sprayers in terms of deposition, loss to the soil and residue of azoxystrobin and tebuconazole applied to sunlit greenhouse tomato and field cucumber. Li Y; Li Y; Pan X; Li QX; Chen R; Li X; Pan C; Song J Pest Manag Sci; 2018 Feb; 74(2):448-455. PubMed ID: 28898566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Spray drift reduction under Southern European conditions: a pilot study in the Ecopest Project in Greece. Kasiotis KM; Glass CR; Tsakirakis AN; Machera K Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 479-480():132-7. PubMed ID: 24561292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluationof compact air-induction flat fan nozzles for herbicide applications: Spray drift and biological efficacy. Wang S; Li X; Nuyttens D; Zhang L; Liu Y; Li X Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1018626. PubMed ID: 36818846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer: effect of spray volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat. Wang G; Lan Y; Qi H; Chen P; Hewitt A; Han Y Pest Manag Sci; 2019 Jun; 75(6):1546-1555. PubMed ID: 30620130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Spray pesticide applications in Mediterranean citrus orchards: Canopy deposition and off-target losses. Garcerá C; Moltó E; Chueca P Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 599-600():1344-1362. PubMed ID: 28525940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of nozzle types and 2,4-D formulations on spray deposition. Contiero RL; Biffe DF; Constantin J; de Oliveira RS; Braz GB; Lucio FR; Schleier JJ J Environ Sci Health B; 2016 Dec; 51(12):888-893. PubMed ID: 27768529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: field drift experiments. Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Dekeyser D; Sonck B Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 19226826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of spray pattern uniformity using three unique analyses as impacted by nozzle, pressure, and pulse-width modulation duty cycle. Butts TR; Luck JD; Fritz BK; Hoffmann WC; Kruger GR Pest Manag Sci; 2019 Jul; 75(7):1875-1886. PubMed ID: 30672112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessing the application of spot spray in Nanguo pear orchards: Effect of nozzle type, spray volume rate and adjuvant. Guo S; Yao W; Xu T; Ma H; Sun M; Chen C; Lan Y Pest Manag Sci; 2022 Aug; 78(8):3564-3575. PubMed ID: 35598076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of spray deposition, drift and mass balance from unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer using an artificial vineyard. Wang C; Herbst A; Zeng A; Wongsuk S; Qiao B; Qi P; Bonds J; Overbeck V; Yang Y; Gao W; He X Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jul; 777():146181. PubMed ID: 33689892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. UAV-spray application in vineyards: Flight modes and spray system adjustment effects on canopy deposit, coverage, and off-target losses. Biglia A; Grella M; Bloise N; Comba L; Mozzanini E; Sopegno A; Pittarello M; Dicembrini E; Alcatrão LE; Guglieri G; Balsari P; Aimonino DR; Gay P Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 845():157292. PubMed ID: 35820523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Classification of spray nozzles based on droplet size distributions and wind tunnel tests. De Schamphelerie M; Spanoghe P; Nuyttens D; Baetens K; Cornelis W; Gabriels D; Van der Meeren P Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):201-7. PubMed ID: 17390794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Design and experimental research of air-assisted nozzle for pesticide application in orchard. Ou M; Zhang J; Du W; Wu M; Gao T; Jia W; Dong X; Zhang T; Ding S Front Plant Sci; 2024; 15():1405530. PubMed ID: 39045595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]