272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19834894)
21. Metabolite profiling for analysis of yeast stress response during very high gravity ethanol fermentations.
Devantier R; Scheithauer B; Villas-Bôas SG; Pedersen S; Olsson L
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Jun; 90(6):703-14. PubMed ID: 15812801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Inoculum size-dependent interactive regulation of metabolism and stress response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by comparative metabolomics.
Ding MZ; Tian HC; Cheng JS; Yuan YJ
J Biotechnol; 2009 Dec; 144(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 19808067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Exploring novel function of yeast Ssa1/2p by quantitative profiling proteomics using NanoESI-LC-MS/MS.
Matsumoto R; Nam HW; Agrawal GK; Kim YS; Iwahashi H; Rakwal R
J Proteome Res; 2007 Sep; 6(9):3465-74. PubMed ID: 17691831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative proteome analysis of robust Saccharomyces cerevisiae insights into industrial continuous and batch fermentation.
Cheng JS; Qiao B; Yuan YJ
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 81(2):327-38. PubMed ID: 18923828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Carbon fluxes of xylose-consuming Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains are affected differently by NADH and NADPH usage in HMF reduction.
Almeida JR; Bertilsson M; Hahn-Hägerdal B; Lidén G; Gorwa-Grauslund MF
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Sep; 84(4):751-61. PubMed ID: 19506862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Inhibitors and their effects on Saccharomyces cerevisiae and relevant countermeasures in bioprocess of ethanol production from lignocellulose--a review].
Li H; Zhang X; Shen Y; Dong Y; Bao X
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2009 Sep; 25(9):1321-8. PubMed ID: 19938474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Proteomic analysis of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae upon iron deficiency induced via human H-ferritin production.
Seo HY; Chang YJ; Chung YJ; Kim KS
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):1368-76. PubMed ID: 18756096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Transcriptional profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae T2 cells upon exposure to hardwood spent sulphite liquor: comparison to acetic acid, furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural.
Bajwa PK; Ho CY; Chan CK; Martin VJ; Trevors JT; Lee H
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2013 Jun; 103(6):1281-95. PubMed ID: 23539198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Proteomic evolution of a wine yeast during the first hours of fermentation.
Salvadó Z; Chiva R; Rodríguez-Vargas S; Rández-Gil F; Mas A; Guillamón JM
FEMS Yeast Res; 2008 Nov; 8(7):1137-46. PubMed ID: 18503542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds.
Keating JD; Panganiban C; Mansfield SD
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2006 Apr; 93(6):1196-206. PubMed ID: 16470880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bat2p is essential in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for fusel alcohol production on the non-fermentable carbon source ethanol.
Schoondermark-Stolk SA; Tabernero M; Chapman J; Ter Schure EG; Verrips CT; Verkleij AJ; Boonstra J
FEMS Yeast Res; 2005 May; 5(8):757-66. PubMed ID: 15851104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Importance of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) for vanillin tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Nguyen TT; Kitajima S; Izawa S
J Biosci Bioeng; 2014 Sep; 118(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 24725964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase 6 reduces inhibitory effect of furan derivatives on cell growth and ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Park SE; Koo HM; Park YK; Park SM; Park JC; Lee OK; Park YC; Seo JH
Bioresour Technol; 2011 May; 102(10):6033-8. PubMed ID: 21421300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Proteomics: where's Waldo in yeast?
Wohlschlegel JA; Yates JR
Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):671-2. PubMed ID: 14562083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Btn2p is involved in ethanol tolerance and biofilm formation in flor yeast.
Espinazo-Romeu M; Cantoral JM; Matallana E; Aranda A
FEMS Yeast Res; 2008 Nov; 8(7):1127-36. PubMed ID: 18554307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Insertion of transposon in the vicinity of SSK2 confers enhanced tolerance to furfural in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Kim HS; Kim NR; Kim W; Choi W
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Jul; 95(2):531-40. PubMed ID: 22639140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Adaptation of a recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain to a sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate with high content of fermentation inhibitors.
Martín C; Marcet M; Almazán O; Jönsson LJ
Bioresour Technol; 2007 Jul; 98(9):1767-73. PubMed ID: 16934451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Overexpression of the yeast transcription activator Msn2 confers furfural resistance and increases the initial fermentation rate in ethanol production.
Sasano Y; Watanabe D; Ukibe K; Inai T; Ohtsu I; Shimoi H; Takagi H
J Biosci Bioeng; 2012 Apr; 113(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 22178024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of furfural on anaerobic glycolytic kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch culture.
Palmqvist E; Almeida JS; Hahn-Hägerdal B
Biotechnol Bioeng; 1999 Feb; 62(4):447-54. PubMed ID: 9921153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of glucose/xylose cofermentation of poplar hydrolysates processed by different pretreatment technologies.
Lu Y; Warner R; Sedlak M; Ho N; Mosier NS
Biotechnol Prog; 2009; 25(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 19319980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
