210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19835043)
1. Skin sensitization: understanding the in vivo situation for the development of reliable in vitro test approaches.
Aeby P; Python F; Goebel C
ALTEX; 2007; 24 Spec No():3-5. PubMed ID: 19835043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro detection of contact allergens: development of an optimized protocol using human peripheral blood monocyte-derived dendritic cells.
Reuter H; Spieker J; Gerlach S; Engels U; Pape W; Kolbe L; Schmucker R; Wenck H; Diembeck W; Wittern KP; Reisinger K; Schepky AG
Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Feb; 25(1):315-23. PubMed ID: 20932890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hapten-protein binding: from theory to practical application in the in vitro prediction of skin sensitization.
Divkovic M; Pease CK; Gerberick GF; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Oct; 53(4):189-200. PubMed ID: 16191014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro and in vivo testing techniques for allergic contact dermatitis.
Gerberick GF; Sikorski EE
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Jun; 9(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 9601899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Contact dermatitis due to cosmetics].
Vigan M
Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2003 Apr; 130(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 12843864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Intralaboratory validation of four in vitro assays for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
Bauch C; Kolle SN; Fabian E; Pachel C; Ramirez T; Wiench B; Wruck CJ; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Sep; 25(6):1162-8. PubMed ID: 21669280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A chemical dataset for evaluation of alternative approaches to skin-sensitization testing.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kern PS; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Patlewicz GY; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):274-88. PubMed ID: 15209809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials.
Bauch C; Kolle SN; Ramirez T; Eltze T; Fabian E; Mehling A; Teubner W; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Aug; 63(3):489-504. PubMed ID: 22659254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Filling the concept with data: integrating data from different in vitro and in silico assays on skin sensitizers to explore the battery approach for animal-free skin sensitization testing.
Natsch A; Emter R; Ellis G
Toxicol Sci; 2009 Jan; 107(1):106-21. PubMed ID: 18832184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [In vitro testing for allergic contact dermatitis].
Brehler R; Merk H
Hautarzt; 2005 Dec; 56(12):1141-3. PubMed ID: 16283125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of IL-18 production in a human keratinocyte cell line to discriminate contact sensitizers from irritants and low molecular weight respiratory allergens.
Corsini E; Mitjans M; Galbiati V; Lucchi L; Galli CL; Marinovich M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2009 Aug; 23(5):789-96. PubMed ID: 19397996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross talk between keratinocytes and dendritic cells: impact on the prediction of sensitization.
Hennen J; Aeby P; Goebel C; Schettgen T; Oberli A; Kalmes M; Blömeke B
Toxicol Sci; 2011 Oct; 123(2):501-10. PubMed ID: 21742781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skin sensitisation: the Colipa strategy for developing and evaluating non-animal test methods for risk assessment.
Maxwell G; Aeby P; Ashikaga T; Bessou-Touya S; Diembeck W; Gerberick F; Kern P; Marrec-Fairley M; Ovigne JM; Sakaguchi H; Schroeder K; Tailhardat M; Teissier S; Winkler P
ALTEX; 2011; 28(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 21311850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Multiple contact sensitization].
Schwitulla J; Uter W
Hautarzt; 2015 Sep; 66(9):680-5. PubMed ID: 26307632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment.
Basketter D; Darlenski R; Fluhr JW
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2008; 21(4):191-202. PubMed ID: 18509253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The lymphocyte transformation test in allergic contact dermatitis: New opportunities.
Popple A; Williams J; Maxwell G; Gellatly N; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
J Immunotoxicol; 2016; 13(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 25655136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Possible anergy after generalized orally elicited allergic contact dermatitis to corticosteroid.
Thong HY; Yokota M; Chan H; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Feb; 58(2):126-8. PubMed ID: 18186763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of an optimized protocol using human peripheral blood monocyte derived dendritic cells for the in vitro detection of sensitizers: Results of a ring study in five laboratories.
Reuter H; Gerlach S; Spieker J; Ryan C; Bauch C; Mangez C; Winkler P; Landsiedel R; Templier M; Mignot A; Gerberick F; Wenck H; Aeby P; Schepky A
Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Aug; 29(5):976-86. PubMed ID: 25868915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
