BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19835656)

  • 1. Do perceptual asymmetries differ in peripersonal and extrapersonal space?
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Jan; 16(1):210-4. PubMed ID: 19835656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual search patterns in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    Butler BC; Lawrence M; Eskes GA; Klein R
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):869-78. PubMed ID: 19154749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space.
    Heber IA; Siebertz S; Wolter M; Kuhlen T; Fimm B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 20537456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Female advantage for object location memory in peripersonal but not extrapersonal space.
    Saucier D; Lisoway A; Green S; Elias L
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2007 Jul; 13(4):683-6. PubMed ID: 17521491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Upper and lower visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():108-15. PubMed ID: 21362412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural bases of personal and extrapersonal neglect in humans.
    Committeri G; Pitzalis S; Galati G; Patria F; Pelle G; Sabatini U; Castriota-Scanderbeg A; Piccardi L; Guariglia C; Pizzamiglio L
    Brain; 2007 Feb; 130(Pt 2):431-41. PubMed ID: 17008330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Covert orienting within peripersonal and extrapersonal space: young adults.
    Losier BJ; Klein RM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 May; 19(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 15062864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task.
    Loftus AM; Vijayakumar N; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 19231481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Directional collisions during a route-following task.
    Thomas NA; Stuckel D; Gutwin C; Elias LJ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Mar; 15(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 19203435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
    Stenneken P; van Eimeren L; Keller I; Jacobs AM; Kerkhoff G
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():166-78. PubMed ID: 18054900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pseudoneglect in back space.
    Cocchini G; Watling R; Della Sala S; Jansari A
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Feb; 63(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 16934381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dorsal stream contributions to perceptual asymmetries.
    Thomas NA; Schneider O; Gutwin C; Elias LJ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2012 Mar; 18(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 22133034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gradients of detection in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    Butler BC; Eskes GA; Vandorpe RA
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(3):346-58. PubMed ID: 14670573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M
    Cortex; 2000 Dec; 36(5):715-31. PubMed ID: 11195917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rotation or translation of auditory space in neglect? A case study of chronic right-sided neglect.
    Kerkhoff G; Schindler I; Artinger F; Zoelch C; Bublak P; Finke K
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):923-30. PubMed ID: 16256151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An investigation of the relationship between free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for vertical and horizontal stimuli.
    Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Berberovic N; Smith A; Bradshaw JL
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 May; 19(3):289-301. PubMed ID: 15062866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Convergent and divergent effects of neck proprioceptive and visual motion stimulation on visual space processing in neglect.
    Schindler I; Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(9):1149-55. PubMed ID: 15178166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When they see, they see it almost right: normal subjective experience of detected stimuli in spatial neglect.
    Bonneh YS; Sagi D; Gorea A; Soroker N; Treger J; Pavlovskaya M
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Nov; 446(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18822347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Space re-exploration in hemispatial neglect.
    Parton A; Malhotra P; Nachev P; Ames D; Ball J; Chataway J; Husain M
    Neuroreport; 2006 May; 17(8):833-6. PubMed ID: 16708024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.