418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19835798)
1. Uterine vascular occlusion in management of leiomyomas: laparoscopy vs laparotomy.
Lee WL; Liu WM; Cheng MH; Chao HT; Fuh JL; Wang PH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):562-8. PubMed ID: 19835798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Symptomatic myoma treated with laparoscopic uterine vessel occlusion and subsequent immediate myomectomy: which is the optimal surgical approach?
Wang PH; Liu WM; Fuh JL; Chao HT; Yuan CC; Chao KC
Fertil Steril; 2009 Aug; 92(2):762-9. PubMed ID: 18930209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic uterine vessel occlusion in the treatment of women with symptomatic uterine myomas with and without adding laparoscopic myomectomy: 4-year results.
Wang PH; Liu WM; Fuh JL; Chao HT; Chao KC; Yuan CC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(6):712-8. PubMed ID: 18971134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of combined laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion and myomectomy via minilaparotomy in the treatment of recurrent uterine myomas.
Liu WM; Wang PH; Chou CS; Tang WL; Wang IT; Tzeng CR
Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):356-61. PubMed ID: 17069812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective short-term evaluation of uterine leiomyomas treated by myomectomy through conventional laparotomy or ultraminilaparotomy.
Wen KC; Sung PL; Chao KC; Lee WL; Liu WM; Wang PH
Fertil Steril; 2008 Dec; 90(6):2361-6. PubMed ID: 18177871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted minilaparotomy myomectomy for removal of large uterine myoma: short-term outcomes.
Tan J; Sun Y; Dai H; Zhong B; Wang D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(4):402-9. PubMed ID: 18602045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of ultraminilaparotomy for myomectomy through midline vertical incision or modified Pfannenstiel incision--a prospective short-term follow-up.
Wang PH; Liu WM; Fuh JL; Chao HT; Yuan CC; Chao KC
Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1945-50. PubMed ID: 18410938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective study of laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy in the treatment of uterine myomas.
Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Bifulco G; Ercoli A; Malzoni M; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(6):470-4. PubMed ID: 16337572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short-term advantages of laparoscopic uterine vessel occlusion in the management of women with symptomatic myoma.
Wang KC; Chang WH; Liu WM; Yen YK; Huang N; Wang PH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Dec; 51(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 23276556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of uterine vessel occlusion in the management of uterine myomas: two different approaches.
Lee WL; Liu WM; Fuh JL; Tsai YC; Shih CC; Wang PH
Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1875-81. PubMed ID: 20045514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized study of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy for uterine myomas.
Alessandri F; Lijoi D; Mistrangelo E; Ferrero S; Ragni N
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 16527709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Directed laparoscopic cryomyolysis for symptomatic leiomyomata: one-year follow up.
Zupi E; Marconi D; Sbracia M; Exacoustos C; Piredda A; Sorrenti G; Townsend D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(4):343-6. PubMed ID: 16036195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Controlled clinical trial assessing the effect of laparoscopic uterine arterial occlusion on ovarian reserve.
Qu X; Cheng Z; Yang W; Xu L; Dai H; Hu L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 20129332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy in women with symptomatic uterine myomas: short-term and fertility results.
Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Iuzzolino D; Surico D; Reich H
Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2368-73. PubMed ID: 19285666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized, controlled study comparing minilaparotomy versus isobaric gasless laparoscopic assisted minilaparotomy myomectomy for removal of large uterine myomas: short-term outcomes.
Tan J; Sun Y; Zhong B; Dai H; Wang D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Jul; 145(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 19427094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of combined laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy in treatment of symptomatic myoma.
Alborzi S; Ghannadan E; Alborzi S; Alborzi M
Fertil Steril; 2009 Aug; 92(2):742-7. PubMed ID: 18692826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uterine artery occlusion and myomectomy for treatment of pregnant women with uterine leiomyomas who are undergoing cesarean section.
Lin JY; Lee WL; Wang PH; Lai MJ; Chang WH; Liu WM
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Apr; 36(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 20492378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing uterine fibroids treated by myomectomy through traditional laparotomy and 2 modified approaches: ultraminilaparotomy and laparoscopically assisted ultraminilaparotomy.
Wen KC; Chen YJ; Sung PL; Wang PH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Feb; 202(2):144.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20035917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A modified suture technique for laparoscopic myomectomy.
Yuen LT; Hsu LJ; Lee CL; Wang CJ; Soong YK
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 17478362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic uterine myomas with and without in situ morcellation.
Chang WC; Chou LY; Chang DY; Huang PS; Huang SC; Chen SY; Sheu BC
Hum Reprod; 2011 Jul; 26(7):1735-40. PubMed ID: 21540245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]