BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19835868)

  • 1. New molecular targets in radiotherapy: DNA damage signalling and repair in targeted and non-targeted cells.
    Burdak-Rothkamm S; Prise KM
    Eur J Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 625(1-3):151-5. PubMed ID: 19835868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BRCA1, FANCD2 and Chk1 are potential molecular targets for the modulation of a radiation-induced DNA damage response in bystander cells.
    Burdak-Rothkamm S; Rothkamm K; McClelland K; Al Rashid ST; Prise KM
    Cancer Lett; 2015 Jan; 356(2 Pt B):454-61. PubMed ID: 25304378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ionizing radiation-induced bystander effects, potential targets for modulation of radiotherapy.
    Rzeszowska-Wolny J; Przybyszewski WM; Widel M
    Eur J Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 625(1-3):156-64. PubMed ID: 19835860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breaking the DNA Damage Response via Serine/Threonine Kinase Inhibitors to Improve Cancer Treatment.
    Rozpędek W; Pytel D; Nowak-Zduńczyk A; Lewko D; Wojtczak R; Diehl JA; Majsterek I
    Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(8):1425-1445. PubMed ID: 29345572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DNA damage response signaling pathways and targets for radiotherapy sensitization in cancer.
    Huang RX; Zhou PK
    Signal Transduct Target Ther; 2020 May; 5(1):60. PubMed ID: 32355263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bystander effects as manifestation of intercellular communication of DNA damage and of the cellular oxidative status.
    Klammer H; Mladenov E; Li F; Iliakis G
    Cancer Lett; 2015 Jan; 356(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 24370566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systemic mechanisms and effects of ionizing radiation: A new 'old' paradigm of how the bystanders and distant can become the players.
    Nikitaki Z; Mavragani IV; Laskaratou DA; Gika V; Moskvin VP; Theofilatos K; Vougas K; Stewart RD; Georgakilas AG
    Semin Cancer Biol; 2016 Jun; 37-38():77-95. PubMed ID: 26873647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DNA-PKcs and ATM influence generation of ionizing radiation-induced bystander signals.
    Hagelstrom RT; Askin KF; Williams AJ; Ramaiah L; Desaintes C; Goodwin EH; Ullrich RL; Bailey SM
    Oncogene; 2008 Dec; 27(53):6761-9. PubMed ID: 18679419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation of switch from ATM to ATR signaling at the sites of DNA damage induced by low and high LET radiation.
    Saha J; Wang M; Cucinotta FA
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2013 Dec; 12(12):1143-51. PubMed ID: 24238855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of oxidative DNA damage in radiation induced bystander effect.
    Havaki S; Kotsinas A; Chronopoulos E; Kletsas D; Georgakilas A; Gorgoulis VG
    Cancer Lett; 2015 Jan; 356(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 24530228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Depletion of ATR selectively sensitizes ATM-deficient human mammary epithelial cells to ionizing radiation and DNA-damaging agents.
    Cui Y; Palii SS; Innes CL; Paules RS
    Cell Cycle; 2014; 13(22):3541-50. PubMed ID: 25483091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation-induced bystander and systemic effects serve as a unifying model system for genotoxic stress responses.
    Burdak-Rothkamm S; Rothkamm K
    Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res; 2018; 778():13-22. PubMed ID: 30454679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in three-dimensional human skin model system.
    Su Y; Meador JA; Geard CR; Balajee AS
    Exp Dermatol; 2010 Aug; 19(8):e16-22. PubMed ID: 19650866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Negative Modulation of Bystander DNA Repair Potential by X-Ray Targeted Tissue Volume in Arabidopsis thaliana.
    Deng C; Wu J; Wang T; Wang G; Wu L; Wu Y; Bian P
    Radiat Res; 2019 Jun; 191(6):556-565. PubMed ID: 31017526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ku70/80 modulates ATM and ATR signaling pathways in response to DNA double strand breaks.
    Tomimatsu N; Tahimic CG; Otsuki A; Burma S; Fukuhara A; Sato K; Shiota G; Oshimura M; Chen DJ; Kurimasa A
    J Biol Chem; 2007 Apr; 282(14):10138-45. PubMed ID: 17272272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence of an adaptive response targeting DNA nonhomologous end joining and its transmission to bystander cells.
    Klammer H; Kadhim M; Iliakis G
    Cancer Res; 2010 Nov; 70(21):8498-506. PubMed ID: 20861183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DNA Repair.
    Borgmann K; Köcher S; Kriegs M; Mansour WY; Parplys AC; Rieckmann T; Rothkamm K
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 2016; 198():1-24. PubMed ID: 27318679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ATM acts downstream of ATR in the DNA damage response signaling of bystander cells.
    Burdak-Rothkamm S; Rothkamm K; Prise KM
    Cancer Res; 2008 Sep; 68(17):7059-65. PubMed ID: 18757420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nitric oxide-mediated bystander signal transduction induced by heavy-ion microbeam irradiation.
    Tomita M; Matsumoto H; Funayama T; Yokota Y; Otsuka K; Maeda M; Kobayashi Y
    Life Sci Space Res (Amst); 2015 Jul; 6():36-43. PubMed ID: 26256626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhanced DNA double-strand break repair of microbeam targeted A549 lung carcinoma cells by adjacent WI38 normal lung fibroblast cells via bi-directional signaling.
    Kobayashi A; Tengku Ahmad TAF; Autsavapromporn N; Oikawa M; Homma-Takeda S; Furusawa Y; Wang J; Konishi T
    Mutat Res; 2017 Oct; 803-805():1-8. PubMed ID: 28689138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.