269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19836077)
1. A Bayesian approach for determining the no effect concentration and hazardous concentration in ecotoxicology.
Fox DR
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Feb; 73(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 19836077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the application of loss functions in determining assessment factors for ecological risk.
Hickey GL; Craig PS; Hart A
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 18691758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Probabilistic dose-response modeling: case study using dichloromethane PBPK model results.
Marino DJ; Starr TB
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Dec; 49(3):285-300. PubMed ID: 17949874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Towards quantitative uncertainty assessment for cancer risks: central estimates and probability distributions of risk in dose-response modeling.
Kopylev L; Chen C; White P
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Dec; 49(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 17905499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. From individual to population level effects of toxicants in the tubicifid Branchiura sowerbyi using threshold effect models in a Bayesian framework.
Ducrot V; Billoir E; Péry AR; Garric J; Charles S
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(9):3566-71. PubMed ID: 20380436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Competing statistical methods for the fitting of normal species sensitivity distributions: recommendations for practitioners.
Hickey GL; Craig PS
Risk Anal; 2012 Jul; 32(7):1232-43. PubMed ID: 22050459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions.
Aldenberg T; Jaworska JS
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2000 May; 46(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 10805987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the use of hierarchical probabilistic models for characterizing and managing uncertainty in risk/safety assessment.
Kodell RL; Chen JJ
Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):433-7. PubMed ID: 17511709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian population analysis of a washin-washout physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for acetone.
Mörk AK; Jonsson F; Johanson G
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Nov; 240(3):423-32. PubMed ID: 19660484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A probabilistic effect assessment model for hazardous substances at the workplace.
Schneider K; Schuhmacher-Wolz U; Hassauer M; Darschnik S; Elmshäuser E; Mosbach-Schulz O
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 16356615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Precautionary Principle and statistical approaches to uncertainty.
Keiding N; Budtz-Jørgensen E
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(1):147-51. PubMed ID: 15212218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian approach for quantifying the uncertainty of neutron doses derived from spectrometric measurements.
Reginatto M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 16877470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revised assessment of cancer risk to dichloromethane: part I Bayesian PBPK and dose-response modeling in mice.
Marino DJ; Clewell HJ; Gentry PR; Covington TR; Hack CE; David RM; Morgott DA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Jun; 45(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 16442684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Joint propagation of variability and imprecision in assessing the risk of groundwater contamination.
Baudrit C; Guyonnet D; Dubois D
J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):72-84. PubMed ID: 17321003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying uncertainty associated with microbial count data: a Bayesian approach.
Clough HE; Clancy D; O'Neill PD; Robinson SE; French NP
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):610-6. PubMed ID: 16011711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian ranking of sites for engineering safety improvements: decision parameter, treatability concept, statistical criterion, and spatial dependence.
Miaou SP; Song JJ
Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Jul; 37(4):699-720. PubMed ID: 15949462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Species Sensitivity Distribution estimation from uncertain (QSAR-based) effects data.
Aldenberg T; Rorije E
Altern Lab Anim; 2013 Mar; 41(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 23614542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian analysis of physiologically based toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic models.
Hack CE
Toxicology; 2006 Apr; 221(2-3):241-8. PubMed ID: 16466842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of wildlife hazard levels using interspecies correlation models and standard laboratory rodent toxicity data.
Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Barron MG
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(24):1604-9. PubMed ID: 20077235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
