These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19836207)
1. Pharmaceutical company-sponsored drug trials: what are we to believe? Shekelle P J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Feb; 63(2):126-7. PubMed ID: 19836207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Pharmaceutical company-sponsored drug trials: the system is broken. Gartlehner G; Fleg A J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Feb; 63(2):128-9. PubMed ID: 19880288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Industry-promoted research and the significance principle]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 May; 218(5):A90-1. PubMed ID: 11417352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Are treatment effects or adverse effects of significance for the association between financing and conclusions in randomized trials?]. Als-Nielsen BE; Chen W; Gluud CN; Gluud LL Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Apr; 166(18):1676-8. PubMed ID: 15174406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [ACCOMPLISH and the risks with company sponsored clinical trials]. Furberg C Lakartidningen; 2009 Feb 11-17; 106(7):450. PubMed ID: 19350775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Industry sponsorship and selection of comparators in randomized clinical trials. Lathyris DN; Patsopoulos NA; Salanti G; Ioannidis JP Eur J Clin Invest; 2010 Feb; 40(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 20050879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Large clinical trials in epilepsy: funding by the NIH versus pharmaceutical industry. Privitera M Epilepsy Res; 2006 Jan; 68(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 16377139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Avoiding legal and ethical pitfalls of industry-sponsored research: the co-existence of research, scholarship, and marketing in the pharmaceutical industry. Dorfman HL; Reig LP Food Drug Law J; 2004; 59(4):595-615. PubMed ID: 15880876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Industry-sponsored pharmaceutical trials and research ethics boards: are they cloaked in too much secrecy? Ferris LE CMAJ; 2002 May; 166(10):1279-80. PubMed ID: 12041844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Independent research should be supported]. Als-Nielsen B; Gluud C; Gluud LL Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Oct; 165(44):4237; author reply 4237-8. PubMed ID: 14621563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bias in the design, interpretation, and publication of industry-sponsored clinical research. Hammerschmidt D Minn Med; 2008 Jun; 91(6):46-7. PubMed ID: 18616022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative effectiveness reviews and the impact of funding bias. Gartlehner G; Fleg A J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 63(6):589-90. PubMed ID: 20434022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Support for trials of promising medications through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. A proposal for a new authority category. Glasziou PP Med J Aust; 1995 Jan; 162(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 7605432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Data bases of clinical trials. Albrich JM N Engl J Med; 1999 Jan; 340(1):65-6. PubMed ID: 9882223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Disclosure of competing financial interests and role of sponsors in phase III cancer trials. Tuech JJ; Moutel G; Pessaux P; Thoma V; Schraub S; Herve C Eur J Cancer; 2005 Oct; 41(15):2237-40. PubMed ID: 16214044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of industry sponsorship on the reporting of subgroup analyses within phase III randomised controlled trials in gastrointestinal oncology. Barton S; Peckitt C; Sclafani F; Cunningham D; Chau I Eur J Cancer; 2015 Dec; 51(18):2732-9. PubMed ID: 26608121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Industry sponsorship in research and publishing: who is really to blame for perceived bias? Amsden GW Ann Pharmacother; 2004 Apr; 38(4):714-6. PubMed ID: 14982974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]