343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19836759)
1. Impact of positive apical surgical margins on likelihood of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Kordan Y; Salem S; Chang SS; Clark PE; Cookson MS; Davis R; Herrell SD; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Smith JA; Barocas DA
J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2695-701. PubMed ID: 19836759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biochemical failure in men following radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact of surgical margin status and location.
Pettus JA; Weight CJ; Thompson CJ; Middleton RG; Stephenson RA
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 15201752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positive apical surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy, truth or artefact?
Connolly SS; O'Toole GC; O'Malley KJ; Manecksha R; O'Brien A; Mulvin DW; Quinlan DM
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2004; 38(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 15204423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathological stage T2 subgroups to predict biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy.
Kordan Y; Chang SS; Salem S; Cookson MS; Clark PE; Davis R; Herrell SD; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Smith JA; Barocas DA
J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2291-5. PubMed ID: 19758638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database.
Grossfeld GD; Chang JJ; Broering JM; Miller DP; Yu J; Flanders SC; Henning JM; Stier DM; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1171-7; quiz 1295. PubMed ID: 10737489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Isolated local recurrence is rare after radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancer and positive surgical margins: therapeutic implications.
Han M; Pound CR; Potter SR; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):864-6. PubMed ID: 11176487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer.
Vis AN; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 16413660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multiplicative interaction between surgical margin status and pathological stage.
Budäus L; Isbarn H; Eichelberg C; Lughezzani G; Sun M; Perrotte P; Chun FK; Salomon G; Steuber T; Köllermann J; Sauter G; Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Fisch M; Schlomm T; Haese A; Heinzer H; Huland H; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1341-6. PubMed ID: 20723925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.
Barocas DA; Salem S; Kordan Y; Herrell SD; Chang SS; Clark PE; Davis R; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Cookson MS; Smith JA
J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):990-6. PubMed ID: 20083261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of positive surgical margins on mortality following radical prostatectomy during the prostate specific antigen era.
Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ; Crispen PL; Carlson RE; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Blute ML
J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):1003-9. PubMed ID: 20092854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.
Kausik SJ; Blute ML; Sebo TJ; Leibovich BC; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak J; Zincke H
Cancer; 2002 Sep; 95(6):1215-9. PubMed ID: 12216087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database.
Buschemeyer WC; Hamilton RJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):124-9; discussion 129. PubMed ID: 17997433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adverse prognostic significance of capsular incision with radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shuford MD; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Shintani AK; Tsiatis A; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 15201750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression.
Sofer M; Hamilton-Nelson KL; Civantos F; Soloway MS
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2453-6. PubMed ID: 11992056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression.
Aydin H; Tsuzuki T; Hernandez D; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):551-5. PubMed ID: 15351591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence.
Lu J; Wirth GJ; Wu S; Chen J; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL
J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 22578729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
