545 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19836778)
1. Predictors of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
Ficarra V; Novara G; Secco S; D'Elia C; Boscolo-Berto R; Gardiman M; Cavalleri S; Artibani W
J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2682-8. PubMed ID: 19836778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.
Barocas DA; Salem S; Kordan Y; Herrell SD; Chang SS; Clark PE; Davis R; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Cookson MS; Smith JA
J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):990-6. PubMed ID: 20083261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program?
White MA; De Haan AP; Stephens DD; Maatman TK; Maatman TJ
Urology; 2009 Mar; 73(3):567-71. PubMed ID: 19167036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens assessed by digital image analysis software correlates with other prognostic factors.
Sherwin JC; Mirmilstein G; Pedersen J; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D; Mills J
J Urol; 2010 May; 183(5):1808-14. PubMed ID: 20303103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality improvement in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer: impact of video documentation review on positive surgical margin.
Touijer K; Kuroiwa K; Saranchuk JW; Hassen WA; Trabulsi EJ; Reuter VE; Guillonneau B
J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):765-8. PubMed ID: 15711265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the rate, location and size of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Kasraeian A; Barret E; Chan J; Sanchez-Salas R; Validire P; Cathelineau X; Rozet F; Galiano M; Vallancien G
BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(7):1174-8. PubMed ID: 21392221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate weight: an independent predictor for positive surgical margins during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Msezane LP; Gofrit ON; Lin S; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP; Zorn KC
Can J Urol; 2007 Oct; 14(5):3697-701. PubMed ID: 17949525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Link BA; Nelson R; Josephson DY; Yoshida JS; Crocitto LE; Kawachi MH; Wilson TG
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Localization of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].
Salomon L; Levrel O; de la Taille A; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prog Urol; 2002 Sep; 12(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 12463122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes.
Atug F; Castle EP; Srivastav SK; Burgess SV; Thomas R; Davis R
Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):866-71; discussion 871-2. PubMed ID: 16564614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of frozen section analysis of surgical margins during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a 2608-case experience.
Kakiuchi Y; Choy B; Gordetsky J; Izumi K; Wu G; Rashid H; Joseph JV; Miyamoto H
Hum Pathol; 2013 Aug; 44(8):1556-62. PubMed ID: 23561622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Goetzl MA; Krebill R; Griebling TL; Thrasher JB
Can J Urol; 2009 Apr; 16(2):4553-7. PubMed ID: 19364427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database.
Buschemeyer WC; Hamilton RJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):124-9; discussion 129. PubMed ID: 17997433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Secin FP; Serio A; Bianco FJ; Karanikolas NT; Kuroiwa K; Vickers A; Touijer K; Guillonneau B
Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 17098356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
