154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19837007)
21. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty.
Cunningham BW
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):219S-230S. PubMed ID: 15541670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Creep associated changes in intervertebral disc bulging obtained with a laser scanning device.
Heuer F; Schmitt H; Schmidt H; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Aug; 22(7):737-44. PubMed ID: 17561321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Failure strength of the bovine caudal disc under internal hydrostatic pressure.
Schechtman H; Robertson PA; Broom ND
J Biomech; 2006; 39(8):1401-9. PubMed ID: 15964006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Torsion-induced pressure distribution changes in human intervertebral discs: an in vitro study.
Yantzer BK; Freeman TB; Lee WE; Nichols T; Inamasu J; Guiot B; Johnson WM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(8):881-4. PubMed ID: 17426632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The leakage pathway and effect of needle gauge on degree of disc injury post anular puncture: a comparative study using aged human and adolescent porcine discs.
Wang JL; Tsai YC; Wang YH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):1809-15. PubMed ID: 17762287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis of the mechanical behavior of tissue engineered intervertebral discs under complex loads.
Yao J; Turteltaub SR; Ducheyne P
Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(3):377-87. PubMed ID: 16168476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Direct real-time measurement of in vivo forces in the lumbar spine.
Ledet EH; Tymeson MP; DiRisio DJ; Cohen B; Uhl RL
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 15653089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
Rousseau MA; Bradford DS; Bertagnoli R; Hu SS; Lotz JC
Spine J; 2006; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Spatially varying material properties of the rat caudal intervertebral disc.
Ho MM; Kelly TA; Guo XE; Ateshian GA; Hung CT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):E486-93. PubMed ID: 16816748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of biomechanical function at ideal and varied surgical placement for two lumbar artificial disc implant designs: mobile-core versus fixed-core.
Moumene M; Geisler FH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):1840-51. PubMed ID: 17762291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Creep characteristics of the human spinal column.
Kazarian LE
Orthop Clin North Am; 1975 Jan; 6(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 1113976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro measurement of pressure in intervertebral discs and annulus fibrosus with and without annular tears during discography.
Lee SH; Derby R; Chen Y; Seo KS; Kim MJ
Spine J; 2004; 4(6):614-8. PubMed ID: 15541691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Proof of the biomechanical effect of a lumbar spine-relief orthosis for treatment of sacroiliac pain].
Höfer S; Siemsen CH
Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 18704838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Olfactory stem cells can be induced to express chondrogenic phenotype in a rat intervertebral disc injury model.
Murrell W; Sanford E; Anderberg L; Cavanagh B; Mackay-Sim A
Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):585-94. PubMed ID: 19345615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Thoracolumbar spine mechanics contrasted under compression and shear loading.
Frei H; Oxland TR; Nolte LP
J Orthop Res; 2002 Nov; 20(6):1333-8. PubMed ID: 12472249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of retraction pressure during anterior cervical plate surgery and cervical disc replacement: a cadaveric study.
Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW; Vigna F; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jul; 19(5):312-7. PubMed ID: 16826000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
