These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19837330)

  • 1. Malocclusions resulting from loss of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomies.
    Ellis E; Esmail N
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2528-33. PubMed ID: 19837330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
    Ricard D; Ferri J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complications of osteotomies with rigid fixation.
    Taylor TD
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 1993 Mar; 1(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 8118663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
    Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semirigid bone fixation: a new concept in orthognathic surgery.
    Paulus GW
    J Craniofac Surg; 1991 Dec; 2(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 1814495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading.
    Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 16053877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
    Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stability of hard tissue profile after mandibular setback in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study.
    Joss CU; Thüer UW
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 18678756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neurosensory disturbances one year after bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy performed with separators.
    van Merkesteyn JP; Zweers A; Corputty JE
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):222-6. PubMed ID: 17681774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Champy bone plate fixation in sagittal split osteotomies for mandibular advancement.
    McDonald WR; Stoelinga PJ; Blijdorp PA; Schoenaers JA
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1987; 2(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 3473144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Dolanmaz D; Uckan S; Isik K; Saglam H
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 42(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15013544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial frontal morphological changes related to mandibular setback osteotomy using cephalograms.
    Amano K; Yagi T; Iida S; Aikawa T; Yamashiro T; Takada K; Kogo M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 37(7):412-6. PubMed ID: 19482484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Unfavorable effects induced by mandibular surgery in Class II malocclusions].
    Leyder P; Lahbabi M; Panajotopoulos A
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2001 Feb; 102(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11345619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a comparison between miniplate and bicortical screw rigid internal fixation.
    Yamashita Y; Mizuashi K; Shigematsu M; Goto M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 36(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 17150332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of endoscopy for management of bilateral sagittal split complications.
    Kincaid BL; Powers DB; Childress RW; Schmitz JP
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 May; 64(5):846-50. PubMed ID: 16631496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid orthopedic lengthening of the mandible in primates by sagittal split osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis: a pilot study.
    Altuna G; Walker DA; Freeman E
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 9081994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.
    Oguz Y; Uckan S; Ozden AU; Uckan E; Eser A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 19615655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neurosensory deficits after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible--influence of soft tissue handling medial to the ascending ramus.
    Panula K; Finne K; Oikarinen K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Sep; 33(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 15308252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Fixation screws and tension bolt technique for osteotomies. Stability study].
    Watzke IM; Tucker MR; Turvey A
    Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1991; 15(6):415-7. PubMed ID: 1817780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Severe Class II malocclusion with facial asymmetry treated with intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy and LeFort I osteotomy.
    Kuroda S; Murakami K; Morishige Y; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):809-19. PubMed ID: 19524842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.