123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19837431)
21. Computerized tomography magnified bone windows are superior to standard soft tissue windows for accurate measurement of stone size: an in vitro and clinical study.
Eisner BH; Kambadakone A; Monga M; Anderson JK; Thoreson AA; Lee H; Dretler SP; Sahani DV
J Urol; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1710-5. PubMed ID: 19230922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical characteristics of ureteral calculi detected by nonenhanced computerized tomography after unclear results of plain radiography and ultrasonography.
Kobayashi T; Nishizawa K; Watanabe J; Ogura K
J Urol; 2003 Sep; 170(3):799-802. PubMed ID: 12913701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of reduced-radiation dual-energy protocols using 320-detector row computed tomography for analyzing urinary calculus components: initial in vitro evaluation.
Cai X; Zhou Q; Yu J; Xian Z; Feng Y; Yang W; Mo X
Urology; 2014 Oct; 84(4):760-5. PubMed ID: 25096333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT.
Levine JA; Neitlich J; Verga M; Dalrymple N; Smith RC
Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9205218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [CT in ureterolithiasis with a radiation dose equal to intravenous urography: results in 209 patients].
Knöpfle E; Hamm M; Wartenberg S; Bohndorf K
Rofo; 2003 Dec; 175(12):1667-72. PubMed ID: 14661138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain.
Dalrymple NC; Verga M; Anderson KR; Bove P; Covey AM; Rosenfield AT; Smith RC
J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):735-40. PubMed ID: 9474137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent.
Liu W; Esler SJ; Kenny BJ; Goh RH; Rainbow AJ; Stevenson GW
Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 10751467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sensitivity of CT scout radiography and abdominal radiography for revealing ureteral calculi on helical CT: implications for radiologic follow-up.
Assi Z; Platt JF; Francis IR; Cohan RH; Korobkin M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Aug; 175(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 10915669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. CT with a computer-simulated dose reduction technique for detection of pediatric nephroureterolithiasis: comparison of standard and reduced radiation doses.
Karmazyn B; Frush DP; Applegate KE; Maxfield C; Cohen MD; Jones RP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jan; 192(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 19098193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of a nonenhanced helical CT protocol for detecting ureteric stones.
Reilly AJ; Addison J
Radiology; 2001 Nov; 221(2):558-9; author reply 559-61. PubMed ID: 11687705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of the clinical utility of the rim and comet-tail signs in differentiating ureteral stones from phleboliths.
Guest AR; Cohan RH; Korobkin M; Platt JF; Bundschu CC; Francis IR; Gebramarium A; Murray UM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Dec; 177(6):1285-91. PubMed ID: 11717067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Radiation exposure in urology: a genitourinary catalogue for diagnostic imaging.
Neisius A; Wang AJ; Wang C; Nguyen G; Tsivian M; Kuntz NJ; Astroza GM; Lowry C; Toncheva G; Yoshizumi TT; Preminger GM; Ferrandino MN; Lipkin ME
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2117-23. PubMed ID: 23764073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Soft-tissue "rim" sign in the diagnosis of ureteral calculi with use of unenhanced helical CT.
Heneghan JP; Dalrymple NC; Verga M; Rosenfield AT; Smith RC
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):709-11. PubMed ID: 9051021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size.
Narepalem N; Sundaram CP; Boridy IC; Yan Y; Heiken JP; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2002 Mar; 167(3):1235-8. PubMed ID: 11832704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Unenhanced spiral CT in acute ureteral colic: a replacement for excretory urography?
Ryu JA; Kim B; Jeon YH; Lee J; Lee JW; Jeon SS; Park KH
Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 11752964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Low-dose chest CT with millimetric thin slices: myth or reality?].
Corneloup O; Delval O; Laurent F; Morin M; Vandermarcq P
J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 12736589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Plain abdominal x-ray versus computerized tomography screening: sensitivity for stone localization after nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography.
Jackman SV; Potter SR; Regan F; Jarrett TW
J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):308-10. PubMed ID: 10893571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison.
Sheafor DH; Hertzberg BS; Freed KS; Carroll BA; Keogan MT; Paulson EK; DeLong DM; Nelson RC
Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):792-7. PubMed ID: 11110945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Imaging renal and ureteral stones.
Jones CD
West J Med; 1998 Nov; 169(5):289-90. PubMed ID: 9830362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Acute ureteral obstruction: value of secondary signs of helical unenhanced CT.
Smith RC; Verga M; Dalrymple N; McCarthy S; Rosenfield AT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1109-13. PubMed ID: 8911160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
