These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19838722)

  • 1. Turkey's experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: a series of 25 consecutive cases.
    Göçmen A; Sanlikan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Aug; 282(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19838722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Robotic-assisted gynecological surgeries: a series of the first 14 cases].
    Mejia-Gomez J; Kogan L; Mintz Y; Shveiky D; Benshushan A
    Harefuah; 2011 Sep; 150(9):709-12, 752, 751. PubMed ID: 22026054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
    Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience.
    Reynolds RK; Advincula AP
    Am J Surg; 2006 Apr; 191(4):555-60. PubMed ID: 16531155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Magrina JF; Kho RM; Weaver AL; Montero RP; Magtibay PM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 18279944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
    Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.
    Fiorentino RP; Zepeda MA; Goldstein BH; John CR; Rettenmaier MA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16431325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
    DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning experience using the double-console da Vinci surgical system in gynecology: a prospective cohort study in a University hospital.
    Marengo F; Larraín D; Babilonti L; Spinillo A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):441-5. PubMed ID: 21779771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study.
    Kim YT; Kim SW; Hyung WJ; Lee SJ; Nam EJ; Lee WJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 18035405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results.
    Tomulescu V; Stănciulea O; Bălescu I; Vasile S; Tudor S; Gheorghe C; Vasilescu C; Popescu I
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19499656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.
    Schwartz RO
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Aug; 39(8):625-30. PubMed ID: 7996527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological oncology; initial experience at Oslo Radium Hospital and 16 months follow-up.
    Sert MB; Eraker R
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Dec; 5(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 19569081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Paraiso MF; Ridgeway B; Park AJ; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Falcone T; Einarsson JI
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 208(5):368.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23395927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.