These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

658 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19839682)

  • 1. Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: implications for testing theories of cognition and action.
    Howes A; Lewis RL; Vera A
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):717-51. PubMed ID: 19839682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Queuing network modeling of the psychological refractory period (PRP).
    Wu C; Liu Y
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Oct; 115(4):913-54. PubMed ID: 18954209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An integrated theory of prospective time interval estimation: the role of cognition, attention, and learning.
    Taatgen NA; van Rijn H; Anderson J
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 17638497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modularity beyond perception: evidence from the PRP paradigm.
    Magen H; Cohen A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):395-414. PubMed ID: 20364926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cognitive functions, their development and modern diagnostic methods].
    Klasik A; Janas-Kozik M; Krupka-Matuszczyk I; Augustyniak E
    Przegl Lek; 2006; 63 Suppl 1():29-34. PubMed ID: 17471820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The problem state: a cognitive bottleneck in multitasking.
    Borst JP; Taatgen NA; van Rijn H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):363-82. PubMed ID: 20192536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The psychological refractory period of stopping.
    Horstmann G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):965-81. PubMed ID: 14585017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):274-86. PubMed ID: 12466925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Miller J; Alderton M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 16478333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Analysis of interference effects in simultaneous processing of 2 problems].
    Schubert T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1996; 43(4):625-56. PubMed ID: 9206587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational rationality: linking mechanism and behavior through bounded utility maximization.
    Lewis RL; Howes A; Singh S
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Apr; 6(2):279-311. PubMed ID: 24648415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.
    Schumacher EH; Schwarb H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):270-90. PubMed ID: 19397384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck.
    Schubert T; Fischer R; Stelzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):376-97. PubMed ID: 18377177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?
    Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 15709868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The soft constraints hypothesis: a rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior.
    Gray WD; Sims CR; Fu WT; Schoelles MJ
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jul; 113(3):461-82. PubMed ID: 16802878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection.
    Arnell KM; Duncan J
    Cogn Psychol; 2002 Mar; 44(2):105-47. PubMed ID: 11863322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing.
    Parmentier FB
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):345-62. PubMed ID: 19007926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamics of representational change: entropy, action, and cognition.
    Stephen DG; Dixon JA; Isenhower RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1811-32. PubMed ID: 19968438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.