BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19839701)

  • 1. Enhancement of responding to A after A+/AX+ training: challenges for a comparator theory of learning.
    Esber GR; Pearce JM; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Oct; 35(4):485-97. PubMed ID: 19839701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Failure of retrospective revaluation to influence blocking.
    Dopson JC; Pearce JM; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Oct; 35(4):473-84. PubMed ID: 19839700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overshadowing and associability change.
    Jones PM; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jul; 37(3):287-99. PubMed ID: 21500931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The fate of redundant cues during blocking and a simple discrimination.
    Pearce JM; Dopson JC; Haselgrove M; Esber GR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Apr; 38(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 22486755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protection from latent inhibition provided by a conditioned inhibitor.
    McConnell BL; Wheeler DS; Urcelay GP; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Oct; 35(4):498-508. PubMed ID: 19839702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Associative changes in elements and compounds when the other is reinforced.
    Rescorla RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Apr; 25(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10331923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The hide-and-seek of retrospective revaluation: recovery from blocking is context dependent in human causal learning.
    Boddez Y; Baeyens F; Hermans D; Beckers T
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 21319914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of an ambiguous-feature discrimination.
    Haselgrove M; Robinson J; Nelson A; Pearce JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1710-25. PubMed ID: 18942036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Summation: further assessment of a configural theory.
    Pearce JM; George DN; Aydin A
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Jan; 55(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 11900307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of associative learning in the terrestrial mollusc Limax maximus. II. Appetitive learning.
    Sahley CL; Martin KA; Gelperin A
    J Comp Physiol A; 1990 Aug; 167(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 2231476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The strength of aversive and appetitive associations and maladaptive behaviors.
    Itzhak Y; Perez-Lanza D; Liddie S
    IUBMB Life; 2014 Aug; 66(8):559-71. PubMed ID: 25196552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lesions of rat infralimbic cortex enhance recovery and reinstatement of an appetitive Pavlovian response.
    Rhodes SE; Killcross S
    Learn Mem; 2004; 11(5):611-6. PubMed ID: 15466316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responding to a conditioned stimulus depends on the current associative status of other cues present during training of that specific stimulus.
    Miller RR; Barnet RC; Grahame NJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 1619393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of conditioned stimulus (CS) duration, intertrial interval, and I/T ratio on appetitive Pavlovian conditioning.
    Thrailkill EA; Todd TP; Bouton ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):243-255. PubMed ID: 32175762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neurotoxic hippocampal lesions fail to impair reinstatement of an appetitively conditioned response.
    Fox GD; Holland PC
    Behav Neurosci; 1998 Feb; 112(1):255-60. PubMed ID: 9517833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transient inactivation of the pigeon hippocampus or the nidopallium caudolaterale during extinction learning impairs extinction retrieval in an appetitive conditioning paradigm.
    Lengersdorf D; Stüttgen MC; Uengoer M; Güntürkün O
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 May; 265():93-100. PubMed ID: 24569011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lesions of rat infralimbic cortex result in disrupted retardation but normal summation test performance following training on a Pavlovian conditioned inhibition procedure.
    Rhodes SE; Killcross AS
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Nov; 26(9):2654-60. PubMed ID: 17970744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrospective revaluation: The phenomenon and its theoretical implications.
    Miller RR; Witnauer JE
    Behav Processes; 2016 Feb; 123():15-25. PubMed ID: 26342855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of contextual associations in producing the partial reinforcement acquisition deficit.
    Miguez G; Witnauer JE; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 21707201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparator view of Pavlovian and differential inhibition.
    Urcelay GP; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):271-83. PubMed ID: 16834494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.