BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19839864)

  • 1. Effect of pseudophakia on standard perimetry parameters.
    Mutlu FM; Akay F; Bayer A
    Curr Eye Res; 2009 Sep; 34(9):711-6. PubMed ID: 19839864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of multifocal intraocular lenses on standard automated perimetry test results.
    Aychoua N; Junoy Montolio FG; Jansonius NM
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Apr; 131(4):481-5. PubMed ID: 23430147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision with a monofocal intraocular lens.
    Beiko GHH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jan; 39(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23098630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal evaluation of trifocal and extended depth of focus lenses implantation using standard automated perimetry parameters.
    Abe RY; da Silva MGB; Alves TN; Tzelikis PFM; Hida WT
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 43(4):1285-1289. PubMed ID: 36127503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of yellow-tinted intraocular lens on standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Nilforushan N; Parsamanesh M; Yu F; Nassiri N; Miraftabi A; Coleman AL
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2014; 21(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 25100904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cataract Surgery and Rate of Visual Field Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.
    Kim JH; Rabiolo A; Morales E; Fatehi N; Lee WS; Yu F; Afifi AA; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 201():19-30. PubMed ID: 30703355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of defocus curves of different modern multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Plaza-Puche AB; Alio JL
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 26(5):412-7. PubMed ID: 27135091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bilateral reading performance of 4 multifocal intraocular lens models and a monofocal intraocular lens under bright lighting conditions.
    Rasp M; Bachernegg A; Seyeddain O; Ruckhofer J; Emesz M; Stoiber J; Grabner G; Dexl AK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1950-61. PubMed ID: 23079311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial Clinical Results With a Novel Monofocal-Type Intraocular Lens for Extended Macular Vision in Patients With Macular Degeneration.
    Robbie SJ; Tabernero J; Artal P; Qureshi MA
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Nov; 34(11):718-725. PubMed ID: 30428091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduction in mean deviation values in automated perimetry in eyes with multifocal compared to monofocal intraocular lens implants.
    Farid M; Chak G; Garg S; Steinert RF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 158(2):227-231.e1. PubMed ID: 24784872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Testing Reliability on Visual Field Sensitivity in Normal Eyes: The Singapore Chinese Eye Study.
    Tan NYQ; Tham YC; Koh V; Nguyen DQ; Cheung CY; Aung T; Wong TY; Cheng CY
    Ophthalmology; 2018 Jan; 125(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 28863943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Cillino S; Casuccio A; Di Pace F; Morreale R; Pillitteri F; Cillino G; Lodato G
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1508-16. PubMed ID: 18538402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive versus AcrySof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Vingolo EM; Grenga P; Iacobelli L; Grenga R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1244-7. PubMed ID: 17586381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of vision after AMO Array multifocal intraocular lens implantation.
    Sen HN; Sarikkola AU; Uusitalo RJ; Laatikainen L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2483-93. PubMed ID: 15617914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between pupillary size and intraocular lens decentration and visual acuity of a zonal-progressive multifocal lens and a monofocal lens.
    Hayashi K; Hayashi H; Nakao F; Hayashi F
    Ophthalmology; 2001 Nov; 108(11):2011-7. PubMed ID: 11713071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective randomised double-masked trial of bilateral multifocal, bifocal or monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Leyland MD; Langan L; Goolfee F; Lee N; Bloom PA
    Eye (Lond); 2002 Jul; 16(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 12101459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in contrast sensitivity between monofocal, multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses: long-term results.
    Mesci C; Erbil HH; Olgun A; Aydin N; Candemir B; Akçakaya AA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 38(8):768-77. PubMed ID: 20572819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual performance and contrast sensitivity after phacoemulsification with implantation of aspheric foldable intraocular lenses.
    Nabh R; Ram J; Pandav SS; Gupta A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 19185254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Cataract Opacity Type and Glaucoma Severity on Visual Field Index.
    Chung HJ; Choi JH; Lee YC; Kim SY
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 93(6):575-8. PubMed ID: 27214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of a new refractive multifocal intraocular lens with an inferior segmental near add and a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.
    Alio JL; Plaza-Puche AB; Javaloy J; Ayala MJ; Moreno LJ; Piñero DP
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):555-63. PubMed ID: 22218147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.