BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19840086)

  • 21. Point of failure. Getting physicians on board with CPOE can be a battle, but is one well worth the fight.
    Feldbaum J; Fuller K
    Healthc Inform; 2007 Jun; 24(6):108-10. PubMed ID: 17591120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of electronic pathology ordering in emergency departments on one aspect of test turn around time: a failure time analysis.
    Li L; Georgiou A; Vecellio E; Toouli G; Eigenstetter A; Wilson R; Westbrook JI
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 188():79-85. PubMed ID: 23823292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system: expectations and experiences of users.
    van Doormaal JE; Mol PG; Zaal RJ; van den Bemt PM; Kosterink JG; Vermeulen KM; Haaijer-Ruskamp FM
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2010 Aug; 16(4):738-43. PubMed ID: 20545801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. CPOE in Iran--a viable prospect? Physicians' opinions on using CPOE in an Iranian teaching hospital.
    Kazemi A; Ellenius J; Tofighi S; Salehi A; Eghbalian F; Fors UG
    Int J Med Inform; 2009 Mar; 78(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 18760960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implementation of an electronic medication system and disregarded power of the record.
    Mabeck H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():443-8. PubMed ID: 18487771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of computerized provider order entry and nursing documentation on workflow.
    Asaro PV; Boxerman SB
    Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Oct; 15(10):908-15. PubMed ID: 18785946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implementation of a patient safety incident management system as viewed by doctors, nurses and allied health professionals.
    Travaglia JF; Westbrook MT; Braithwaite J
    Health (London); 2009 May; 13(3):277-96. PubMed ID: 19366837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Emergency department performance at a small rural hospital: an independent in-depth review.
    Tescher P; Chen TM
    Aust J Rural Health; 2009 Dec; 17(6):292-7. PubMed ID: 19930194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A descriptive study on emergency department doctors' and nurses' knowledge and attitudes concerning substance use and substance users.
    Kelleher S; Cotter P
    Int Emerg Nurs; 2009 Jan; 17(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 19135010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computerized physician order entry usage in North America: the doctor is in.
    Whiting SO; Gale A
    Healthc Q; 2008; 11(3):94-7. PubMed ID: 18677848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Significant reduction of laboratory specimen labeling errors by implementation of an electronic ordering system paired with a bar-code specimen labeling process.
    Hill PM; Mareiniss D; Murphy P; Gardner H; Hsieh YH; Levy F; Kelen GD
    Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Dec; 56(6):630-6. PubMed ID: 20822830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Voluntary physician adoption of an inpatient electronic medical record by obstetrician-gynecologists.
    Lagrew DC; Stutman HR; Sicaeros L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):690.e1-5; discussion 690.e5-6. PubMed ID: 18538155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does computerised provider order entry reduce test turnaround times? A before-and-after study at four hospitals.
    Westbrook JI; Georgiou A; Lam M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 150():527-31. PubMed ID: 19745367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. When requests become orders--a formative investigation into the impact of a computerized physician order entry system on a pathology laboratory service.
    Georgiou A; Westbrook J; Braithwaite J; Iedema R; Ray S; Forsyth R; Dimos A; Germanos T
    Int J Med Inform; 2007 Aug; 76(8):583-91. PubMed ID: 16702022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Incremental approach is best with a new EDIS.
    ED Manag; 2007 May; 19(5):52-4. PubMed ID: 17518142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Examination of changes in pathology tests ordered by Diagnosis-Related Group (DRGs) following CPOE introduction.
    Vecellio E; Georgiou A; Toouli G; Eigenstetter A; Li L; Wilson R; Westbrook JI
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 188():114-20. PubMed ID: 23823298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Building rehabilitation capacity in rural in New South Wales.
    Pryor J
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(4):1113. PubMed ID: 19929128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Why patients attend emergency departments for conditions potentially appropriate for primary care: reasons given by patients and clinicians differ.
    Masso M; Bezzina AJ; Siminski P; Middleton R; Eagar K
    Emerg Med Australas; 2007 Aug; 19(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 17655636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cultures in hospitals and their influence on attitudes to, and satisfaction with, the use of clinical information systems.
    Callen JL; Braithwaite J; Westbrook JI
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Aug; 65(3):635-9. PubMed ID: 17475380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using a low-cost simulation approach for assessing the impact of a medication administration system on workflow.
    Kushniruk AW; Borycki EM; Kuwata S; Watanabe H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():567-72. PubMed ID: 18487791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.