944 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19840650)
1. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.
Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation.
Pérez-Heredia M; Ferrer-Luque CM; González-Rodríguez MP
J Endod; 2006 Oct; 32(10):993-7. PubMed ID: 16982281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of different concentrations of EDTA on instrumented root canal walls.
Sen BH; Ertürk O; Pişkin B
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Oct; 108(4):622-7. PubMed ID: 19699113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scanning electron microscopic preliminary study of the efficacy of SmearClear and EDTA for smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation in permanent teeth.
da Silva LA; Sanguino AC; Rocha CT; Leonardo MR; Silva RA
J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1541-4. PubMed ID: 19026891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution and gel for smear layer removal.
Dotto SR; Travassos RM; de Oliveira EP; Machado ME; Martins JL
Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 17697246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation.
Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):308-11. PubMed ID: 20113797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of radicular dentin erosion and smear layer removal capacity of Self-Adjusting File using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite as an initial irrigant.
Kaya S; Yiğit-Özer S; Adigüzel Ö
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 21664155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal wall cleanliness after calcium hydroxide removal using three irrigation regimens.
Naaman A; Kaloustian H; Ounsi HF; Naaman-Bou Abboud N; Ricci C; Medioni E
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 17211500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigating solutions: a comparative scanning electron microscope evaluation.
Ahir B; Parekh V; Katyayan MK; Katyayan PA
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):617-22. PubMed ID: 25511062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the effect of four decalcifying agents combined with 60°C 3% sodium hypochlorite on smear layer removal.
Wu L; Mu Y; Deng X; Zhang S; Zhou D
J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):381-4. PubMed ID: 22341079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Smear layer removal with passive ultrasonic irrigation and the NaviTip FX: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Goel S; Tewari S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 19576804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of different irrigation solutions on root dentine microhardness, smear layer removal and erosion.
Ulusoy Öİ; Görgül G
Aust Endod J; 2013 Aug; 39(2):66-72. PubMed ID: 23890262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of the effectiveness of two canal lubricants in removing smear layer.
Tam A; Yu DC
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Nov; 21(11):967-72; quiz 974. PubMed ID: 11968147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of EDTA with and without surfactants or ultrasonics on removal of smear layer.
Lui JN; Kuah HG; Chen NN
J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):472-5. PubMed ID: 17368342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
