353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19840829)
1. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.
Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
J Dent; 2010 Mar; 38(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 19840829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-year clinical evaluation of one-step self-etch systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
J Dent; 2009 Feb; 37(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 19058889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
Kubo S; Kawasaki K; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
J Dent; 2006 Feb; 34(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 15978714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized, controlled clinical trial of one-step self-etching adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
Zhou Z; Yu S; Jiang Y; Lin Y; Xiong Y; Ni L
Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 19824561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five-year clinical evaluation of One-Up Bond F in non-carious cervical lesions.
Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 18269125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year.
Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; Fieuws S; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Ermis RB; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):847-55. PubMed ID: 18656295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of self-etch adhesives in Class V non-carious lesions.
Abdalla AI; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 17073206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Restoring cervical lesions with flexible composites.
Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt KL; Kanumilli P; Yoshida Y; Inoue S; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
Dent Mater; 2007 Jun; 23(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 16949661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
Dalton Bittencourt D; Ezecelevski IG; Reis A; Van Dijken JW; Loguercio AD
Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Jun; 63(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 16191912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3-year clinical effectiveness of one-step adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions.
Moretto SG; Russo EM; Carvalho RC; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Cardoso MV
J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41(8):675-82. PubMed ID: 23747824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noncarious cervical lesions restored with three different tooth-colored materials: two-year results.
Stojanac IL; Premovic MT; Ramic BD; Drobac MR; Stojsin IM; Petrovic LM
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 22856681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical trial comparing two all-in-one adhesive systems used to restore non-carious cervical lesions: results at one year.
Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
Aust Dent J; 2008 Sep; 53(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 18782367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized clinical evaluation of a one- and two-step self-etch adhesive over 24 months.
Loguercio AD; Mânica D; Ferneda F; Zander-Grande C; Amaral R; Stanislawczuk R; de Carvalho RM; Manso A; Reis A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 20533625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3-year clinical evaluation of modified Gluma adhesive systems in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions.
Hörsted-Bindslev P; Knudsen J; Baelum V
Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 9002810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
